Viewing profile — cf-d-ycom

I'd like to be proven wrong on this point, but it feels to me that this trend is two things, individuals and companies reaping the benefits of technological improvements towards ef…

Is not also the "idea of a social construct" a social construct? And by extension is also arbitrary and meaningless? And surely then every idea of any category is dissolved as mean…

Also, would there not be value in the words from someone who had experience with moral corruption? If I wanted to hear what the world was like outside the city walls, I'd expect th…

What if the advice that would really help someone just happens to be from people who are all below this person's purity test bar?

And perhaps a slightly more liberal approach would be that racism applies to ideas/worldviews/modes of communication rather than baked into people. There is research to indicate pe…

I believe so yeh.

So the base case that they prove is S(1). And the inductive step is to show: S(1) ->(implies) S(2) -> S(3) -> S(4) -> .... Or to write it more succinctly, that S(n) -> S(n + 1) ass…

Yeh, that makes more sense.

Potentially. However, I believe the inductive step is correct. I could be wrong though. ie. If you assume S(2) is true, lets prove S(3), consider a set of 3 people, {a, b, c}. appl…

So this article shows that you can infer S(n+1) from S(n) for n > 1, and a base case of S(1) is true. However, you can't infer S(2) is true from assuming S(1) is true in the same w…