Viewing profile — cedivad
cedivad
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Jul 22, 2017, 9:17 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 152
- Public activity
- 115 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About cedivad
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #42608135
you can run SRSRan on a small self contained SDR such as the Seeve board. Throughput is not going to be good as a custom stack as it's unoptimised, though. https://rfnm.com/blog/in…
-
comment
Comment #38589717
> When my AoA sensor fails, then what? crickets, let's just randomise which sensor we use during boot, that ought to do it!
-
comment
Comment #35370079
Strange. I haven't changed a thing. Just to confirm, the problem yesterday was that the website would be stuck, not that you couldn't move down further by scrolling in an unnatural…
-
comment
Comment #35359635
:-) The HF daughterboard is the only thing that's missing, I think. To be honest, I was hoping for someone to suggest a nice design on that front. Here is a render of the enclosure…
-
comment
Comment #35359267
PPS input/output is off to the side, look for the "User Interface Connector" paragraph on the website. > What do you mean? Do you have your own DSP stack to deal with that while us…
-
comment
Comment #35358043
Is this with an older Firefox version maybe? I've tried with a relatively recent one and couldn't reproduce, but I'll look at the logs and try to fix this now that the HN storm has…
-
comment
Comment #35357481
It would need to be a different design entirely.
-
comment
Comment #35357451
NXP are open sourcing a lot of the support stack for the LA9310 to go along with this product release, but I'm afraid they consider the VSPA DSP to be highly proprietary, yes. Exam…
-
comment
Comment #35357417
The schematics will be released publicly when the product is shipping, but it won't be OSHW. I don't want to end up like the HackRF, where one small company is burdened with suppor…
-
comment
Comment #35356650
You'd probably want something way more sensitive than that, right? Something that goes well into the micro/nanovolts rather than millivolts. But it should be reasonably simple to d…
-
comment
Comment #35356461
8x ADCs and 2x ADCs @ 153 MSPS -> 4x RX I/Q pairs and 1x TX I/Q pair. The way the math works, you can sample a 153 MHz signal at 153 MSPS using I/Q, or you can use each ADC line to…
-
comment
Comment #35355701
We need volumes, so the best I can hope for is people join the waitlist and pre-order when we show a functioning prototype. We already placed sizeable orders with the manufacturers…
-
comment
Comment #35355622
Here is a fast render of what the enclosure might look like (work in progress): https://i.imgur.com/AEYgLxU.png The idea is however you get shielding and cooling, sit it on the des…
-
comment
Comment #35355010
A few practical use cases that are not easily covered by similar platforms: 1) Direction finding thanks to the 8x 153 MSPS ADCs and coherent clocks. 2) Mixed domain analyzer: have …
-
comment
Comment #35354862
No, I think your feedback is fair, MMCX connectors are certainly more durable. Maybe the tradeoff there is that they are not as common, so I might need to include adapters as well.…
-
comment
Comment #35354329
I don't like them either, but I couldn't find a better way to provide the clock in/out feature and still fit in that area of the board. The optional OCXO on the opposite side of th…
-
comment
Comment #35353787
I can't commit to pricing before I have decided on a partner for the distribution (DIY vs Kickstarter vs Crowdsupply, they all come with different costs and tradeoffs), but $550 is…
-
comment
Comment #35353698
The Granita board should already work down to 10 MHz. If you need to go lower, I (or someone else) would need to design a custom RFNM daughterboard for low frequencies. You could d…
-
comment
Comment #35353550
A few reasons: (1) The AFE7903 wouldn't allow for any modularity in the system (look at what we are calling the RFNM interface on the website, I think that's the real reason this p…
-
comment
Comment #35353454
We should have a fair number of boards going around in a couple of months (10-20), when the first batch is done and basic software is complete. Mostly as loaners at first as there …
-
comment
Comment #35353428
I routed the i.MX block like a normal human being, then rotated everything 23 degrees to (1) avoid the fiber weave effect and (2) not collide with any of the mounting holes, as tha…
-
comment
Comment #35345548
*i.MX 8M Plus, please :-) The 8M Plus is not that different from the RPi4! Yes, of course, this will be sold to anybody and be very, very competitive, like in the order of ~$550 in…
-
comment
Comment #35345527
You need to work directly with NXP. Our first big batch will be here in September. We could have had them earlier but there are plenty of different moving parts, things to do and s…
-
comment
Comment #35325192
I designed this system (not the chip, clearly), so feel free to ask any questions!
- story