Viewing profile — cdosborn
cdosborn
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Nov 26, 2013, 7:23 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 89
- Public activity
- 28 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About cdosborn
Recent public activity
- story
-
comment
Comment #42393450
It is a good resource. Drawabox doesn't actually teach you how to rotate cubes. That was pretty frustrating to me. I created a little game which doesn't explain it, but allows you …
-
comment
Comment #42388909
> It's mostly about having low-JS, good SEO, easy access to information, which can be managed by very inexperienced users Nice! I shared in the parent thread about my tool which sp…
-
comment
Comment #42388650
Yeah, I'm not referring to drawing which is copying. > There's very little that can be taught about drawing. While drawing from the imagination is largely about using the intuition…
-
comment
Comment #42386019
Taking a look. For the past two years I've been thinking about drawing. Why it's difficult, how its possible for people like Kim Jung Gi to draw from their imagination. My theory i…
-
comment
Comment #42385706
Cool project. I have a dream to make something like this for drawing spatially. Came to the parent to share my current project which spell checks websites. It found a few small typ…
-
comment
Comment #42385611
I created a website spellchecker/proofreader ( https://spl.ing ). We use aws step functions for the actual processing, it's very cool tech! Reply with your websites, and I'll run a…
-
comment
Comment #9541744
Perhaps, just judge the content.
-
comment
Comment #8646698
That is so fucking great.
-
comment
Comment #8190990
validator passes, thanks.
-
comment
Comment #8190039
Literate programming requires that there is freedom in ordering content in the literate file. Otherwise, you are restricted to the execution order of the computer. The intent of li…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #8187583
Here is an updated example, because a few people were asking for a more complex example. This is the literate version of the root of the program. *Note that the markdown doesn't in…
-
comment
Comment #8187393
If you follow the project, I'm currently writing up the src in literate style :).
-
comment
Comment #8186912
This is a feature I'm looking to add. It was designed to be included. When I parse the lit file, I record the line no. which will be represented in comments in the generated source…
-
comment
Comment #8186193
There should be an HTML class. In the resulting docs I still need a way to separate them from the underlying language (that could be anything). Initially I thought ` >` looked arch…
-
comment
Comment #8185736
No they are not
-
comment
Comment #8185665
This is my opinion https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8185142 In some cases LP won't provide a benefit over commenting. But the idea is that you step outside of the rules of the …
-
comment
Comment #8185516
Its no different then defining a function and calling it later (and proceeding to change the function name in several places). There are tools that generate a TOC based on markdown…
-
comment
Comment #8185481
Literate coffescript falls under one one of the pseudo literate tools, i.e. just nice comments. Not to discredit that approach, its just a compromise for most of the benefit. Many …
-
comment
Comment #8185447
My program has only the two constructs ` >` and ` >=` which you could rather easily alter. src/Processing.he and src/Parse.hs
-
comment
Comment #8185404
I really need a more mature example to show, which will be coming soon. However, many tools exist which are just eesentially auto documentation (java docs, literate Haskell, docco)…
-
comment
Comment #8185202
I need to read more of Knuth on literate programming. The plan is to finish the source in literate style.
-
comment
Comment #8185188
The narrative doesn't have to jump all over the place. If anything, defining macros allows you greater flexibility. Also, using macros allows for defining different levels of langu…
-
comment
Comment #8185171
The project is still early, and the html generation is rudimentary. Will be working soon to validate. Not sure what you mean by appearing twice. I debated removing the " >" syntax …