Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — ccommsxx

ccommsxx

HN member
Joined
Sat, Jun 03, 2017, 1:49 PM UTC
HN karma
95
Public activity
19 items

About ccommsxx

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #14788465

    I don't think you need a good understanding of C++ to appreciate these features per-se. Only if you want to make a statement like "X is an improvement over C++ because of these". F…

  2. comment
    Comment #14787507

    As far as I understand, there is no accepted formal specification or even single source of truth for what the rust community thinks are the "rust memory safety guarantees". Only a …

  3. comment
    Comment #14787440

    You took my post as saying "all systems code should be written in C and that should always stay that way because people don't make mistakes". However, that is not at all what I sai…

  4. comment
    Comment #14787288

    Again, the assertion that all code written in rust is automatically "safe" (let alone correct) is false unless you say what precisely you mean with "safe" in very specific terms. W…

  5. comment
    Comment #14787118

    >> Spend the next 5 years learning the ins and outs of C++, [..,] Spend a single month learning Rust. Play with it for another month or even two just to be sure. Hopefully after th…

  6. comment
    Comment #14787006

    Well, I agree with you on practically everything you said. Just for the record, I never intended to imply that somebody should not criticize their tools until they fully mastered t…

  7. comment
    Comment #14786936

    I feel you're missing my point. The article doesn't mention rust but my comment was phrased in the context of the current rust craze on HN. As I said, I agree with you and the auth…

  8. comment
    Comment #14786767

    The worst thing about these kinds of articles is the troves of junior programmers that never touched systems programming with a stick before but will read this on hackernews today …

  9. comment
    Comment #14559400

    Actually I remembered now that the last time I worked with the MySQL protocol (~2014) I had a similar problem: Some of our servers were still running an old version of MySQL so the…

  10. comment
    Comment #14559391

    Turns out that all of this stuff has apparently been deleted from the official docs some time ago, so that's probably why you didn't find it :) (see sibling comment). When I did a …

  11. comment
    Comment #14559315

    I can see what parents issue was now :) I had a look at the doxygen and all the goold old protocol documentation seems to be deleted/missing from the "official" documentation websi…

  12. comment
    Comment #14558807

    Take a closer look at the MySQL documentation. You dont have to reverse engineer anything - it's all there and documented (source: wrote a client impl based on the docs) http://imy…

  13. comment
    Comment #14554452

    50GB of files in the 50KB-inf range can be at most 10e5 files, not 10e7. (10e7 would be 5TB of 50KB files)

  14. comment
    Comment #14539318

    But how? Where is the opt-in? Is including the javascript from ampproject.org considered an opt-in to give gogole a license to republish your copyrighted content? There is no notic…

  15. comment
    Comment #14539132

    I don't really get what you're trying to say. Are you defending the fact that you benchmarked whats essentially a "function() { return 1; }", called that a "database operation" and…

  16. comment
    Comment #14536215

    Look not to sound harsh but since you're claiming the "80mm ops/sec" as a technical achievement "not possible with other databases" I found it to be fair to actually review the ben…

  17. comment
    Comment #14534784

    We're getting even better numbers on other devices: Android phone, ~5M ops/sec. Macbook Air, Chrome, ~30M ops/sec. Macbook Pro, Chrome Canary, ~80M ops/sec. Lenovo netbook, IE6, ~1…

  18. comment
    Comment #14531981

    I've been waiting for a comment on why re-hosting verbatim copies of the original content by google is not considered copyright infringement? How come there seems to be no discussi…

  19. comment
    Comment #14476364

    looks like this contains a bunch of creative commons (CC-BY-SA) content ripped from wikipedia without proper attribution. please add the missing attribution https://it.wikipedia.or…