Viewing profile — ccachor
ccachor
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Nov 19, 2012, 3:19 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 21
- Public activity
- 28 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About ccachor
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #16547933
Well, Angular has a very heavy initialization penalty, enough that I know of a few companies that ditched it for React. I'll also add, as your front-end becomes more complex and us…
-
comment
Comment #16547920
Pretty badass. In addition to Turbolinks, there is also http://instantclick.io that has the benefit of prefetch which helps with perceived snappiness.
-
comment
Comment #16547886
It is more maintainable (in the sense that functionality isn't bound to the DOM structure or class names). I'd argue there's a bit less repetition across your app, but it's not as …
-
comment
Comment #16547739
I'd also add, moving to components doesn't rely on DOM structure either (ex. $(this).parent().parent().find(:el)...)
-
comment
Comment #16547663
Front-end frameworks are going to give you a few things: more control over routing, more "app" like behavior, instant state changes (easily done), and most of all: your front end i…
-
comment
Comment #16365518
Well, it would probably be built into the insurance carriers' web stack. Dev teams need to keep up with the latest tech so they don't lose talent and can justify ever increasing sa…
-
comment
Comment #16365473
Regardless of hits, React is designed for UIs that need to "React". That's the motivation behind the library. It's better suited to social networking applications than it would be …
-
comment
Comment #16354363
"(whose idea of a standard library is adding an underspecified `fetch` after 15 years of people writing wrappers around XMLHttpRequest)." So true.
-
comment
Comment #16353351
Yes!!!!
-
comment
Comment #16353315
Thank god for speaking up about this. This whole thread has me contemplating a career change. I'd rather dig a hole and fill it back in. The OP is pondering what framework to use f…
-
comment
Comment #16306994
Is it really worth the trade-off? I remember eCommerce sites trying to do similar levels of interactivity with Flash too. I just think, for a catalog site, it seems like you're try…
-
comment
Comment #16288048
Web Monkey
-
comment
Comment #16288038
Based on previous work experience, like-ability, references, and a take home exercise.
-
comment
Comment #16288033
Ha! I've had to do a few of those recently. Unfortunately, they were the ones where you write code as the hiring manager watches. Not a fan of those...
-
comment
Comment #16282740
My understanding of full stack is frontend + backend web development. Sysadmin/devops is it's own discipline.
-
comment
Comment #16280464
Probably except this one: A balance of technical, business, and social/emotional intelligence. More than likely someone with this sort of technical capacity doesn't score well in o…
-
comment
Comment #16280459
Really? At what point does basic become deep?
-
comment
Comment #16280456
See my reply above...
-
comment
Comment #16280450
I'm not sure you parsed the description correctly. They're not looking for someone with a mere grasp on these technologies. ========================================================…
-
comment
Comment #16280406
I imagine it is a more senior role. While it's not uncommon somebody has "experience" in those items listed, it all comes down to what exactly that experience is. Dabbling in misce…
-
comment
Comment #16280207
Encourage more personal photos. And ban links from Newsfeed. It's really that simple.
-
comment
Comment #16275326
You need them to clarify deep understanding? If someone said they wanted a candidate to have a deep understanding of jet engines, I'd expect they know every single thing there is t…
-
comment
Comment #16275308
Except I don't think that's the case. The field is too wide for someone's attention to go deep in all of those areas. You might say, well give me a 10 yr runway. The problem is mos…
-
story
What exactly is Full Stack these days?
I don't know if it's just me, but I'm getting pissed off at job requirements. For example, below: ============================================== The ideal candidate has the followi…
-
comment
Comment #15901639
It's actually PJAX.