Viewing profile — causal

Yeah if you look back at earlier posts on the same blog, definitely not the same style. I'm guessing the author is either lying to save face or has spent so much time with Claude t…

It really reads like an OpenClaw agent instructed to consider itself a real human. The number of upvotes on this post is also REALLY high considering the number of comments calling…

Suspect this is an OpenClaw bot that really believes itself not to be Claude.

It's also just patently false. Taste is not all that is left. Are software engineers really so full of hubris that they thought coding is all that there is to making a product?

I guess I should give it another shot because I had pretty bad experience with Luna when it first came out. Stuff Sonnet knew better.

Old news, no?

It's a turn off both because you don't know if it's accurate at all, and because LLMs have a way of turning 1 sentence ideas into pages of diluted slop.

I'm usually pretty sensitive to AI written content but nothing in this article made me think it was

Well they certainly don't intend to rent you one that works offline.

Yeah. Though I wonder how capable AI is of evolving past? Especially as the content it outputs fortifies the training data that gets scraped.

Right I was going to say, no way of knowing whether these issues are unique to Chinese models.

I also suspect the questions asked matter a lot, and the system prompts matter a lot, because "the map is built from nothing but the words they choose" - so this is more a measure …

So this shows distance relative to other models, but I don't have a good sense for what these numbers say in absolute terms. K3-to-Fable is blue at 0.42. Is 0.42 meaningful, or did…

Yeah if anything it makes Anthropic look incompetent

This is true, models themselves can be dangerous, but my point is that dangerous providers beget dangerous models.

My takeaway is that closed model providers are dangerous. OpenAI and Anthropic are more motivated than anyone to prove that models can be dangerous, and so they will make dangerous…

I think you misunderstand. Code is also representing something. It may be what gets executed, but that does not make it "correct".

Not to mention the "distilled" models almost certainly have other training inputs as well, again watering down the meaning of the word. And if just partial output is all that it ta…

Are you talking about my username? Yeah I liked the word before LLMs made it cool/uncool.

1) Your own Wikipedia link goes on to describe using logits. Yes, language evolves to mean multiple things, and that is my point: Anthropic is pushing for a watered down definition…

Open weights dude. You can literally run it on your own or rented hardware and give your data to exactly nobody, unlike closed models.

"distillation attack" is such a loaded term that really pisses me off. Distillation is a technical term with real meaning, and historically requires logits which Anthropic does not…

Am I dumb or does this chart make no sense? Or why does the line only go up even with compaction? Or maybe "overall trajectory size" is hiding some meaning I don't understand?

"threatens" - Dawg there aint a lead anymore. I've been testing K3 and it is outperforming Sol and Fable on a project of mine, fixing stuff I couldn't get either to.

We need to see private set results, but if this holds then it might represent a breakthrough in other domains as well.