Viewing profile — catshirt
catshirt
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jul 29, 2010, 5:17 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 2,358
- Public activity
- 1,415 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About catshirt
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #15891658
thank you for a thoughtful response. your first point regarding "no non-controversial statements" points out a flaw in my logic that i hope we can move past to my example. i try to…
-
comment
Comment #15891535
so if i can repurpose someone else's example: you're suggesting that if i make a knife for buttering bread and it kills someone because i was careless in my creating of the knife, …
-
comment
Comment #15891520
> A brittle blade that was made to save money but shatters and slices flesh on a bone was an ethical impact. by that logic, basically every decision we ever make has an ethical imp…
-
comment
Comment #15891507
the fact that i might disagree with it (never said i did by the way), would suggest that others might disagree with it, would suggest it is definitively controversial. a lot of the…
-
comment
Comment #15891443
> There is no ethical impact of my job; I build technological systems and it’s up to others how they use them. well that's certainly a controversial way to start a list. does being…
-
comment
Comment #15886410
the reason i am being downvoted is because hacker news is fucking garbage now. too many insecure, underqualified jackasses looking for a reason to argue.
-
comment
Comment #15882525
and saying "they have an app" is ignoring OP's actual point, which is all i am trying to defend. no one is calling into question the merit it's taken to build Shazam as a company. …
-
comment
Comment #15882448
what is your point? saying the algorithm "wouldn't work" without an app is like saying my door doesn't work without a doorknob. OP made a point: Shazam is not magic, and people hav…
-
comment
Comment #15882395
it’s just a button. and in a perfect world I wouldn’t even need a button
-
comment
Comment #15835456
and the ones you do...
-
comment
Comment #15793423
thread i participated in yesterday would suggest about half of HN welcomes it with open arms.
-
comment
Comment #15787522
my only point is that however you interpret the article, pivoting your response towards mocking conspiracy theorists speaks more towards a personal peeve than an objective analysis…
-
comment
Comment #15787396
i don't think your analogy is strong. but instead of continuing to mince words... s/*/plan/ for literally whatever word you choose. and my point stands. discussed? evaluated? none …
-
comment
Comment #15787350
sorry, I’ve edited the word “planned” into my post as to not seem misleading. (forgive me for paraphrasing the title of the thread incorrectly). unsurprisingly, it doesn’t actually…
-
comment
Comment #15787302
“a provocation operation in which Soviet aircraft would appear to attack US or friendly installations to provide an excuse for U.S. intervention” what is that, if not a fake attack…
-
comment
Comment #15787150
news report confirms another instance of the US planning fake attacks on its own citizens for political purposes and your response is to chastise conspiracy theorists? your frustra…
-
comment
Comment #15777272
http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/06/politics/donald-trump-koi-pond... https://gizmodo.com/that-viral-photo-of-president-trump-dump... an honest question, do your content police block CNN…
-
comment
Comment #15777166
dude. i get it. you are only further articulating everything i have already accused you of. you want a company or government to decide what content gets blocked. that is what's par…
-
comment
Comment #15777119
how substantial of you. your post may have been of some value if i didn't indicate i was being coy. alas, i was asking for elaboration on his opinion. not your canned response.
-
comment
Comment #15777111
ok. read the whole article. and i understood you right off the bat just fine. you want to block fiction from the internet. specifically, political fiction. and to be really generou…
-
comment
Comment #15777001
> "real fake news" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slope or (to play coy): you're suggesting we block fiction from the internet...?
-
comment
Comment #15776983
come on. read between the lines. i'm saying that blocking websites is fascist behavior, not noble work. don't abuse your family's trust by imposing political censorship on them.
-
comment
Comment #15776962
their use of "but" would suggest OP is definitely talking about Mozilla
-
comment
Comment #15776939
in addition to the closet racists, the last election seems to be outing the closet fascists.
-
comment
Comment #15776331
yea, but we're not talking about the rest of the world in this thread, are we? also seems a little misguided to defend to a generalization with another generalization. no? lighten …