Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — catshirt

catshirt

HN member
Joined
Thu, Jul 29, 2010, 5:17 PM UTC
HN karma
2,358
Public activity
1,415 items

About catshirt

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #15891658

    thank you for a thoughtful response. your first point regarding "no non-controversial statements" points out a flaw in my logic that i hope we can move past to my example. i try to…

  2. comment
    Comment #15891535

    so if i can repurpose someone else's example: you're suggesting that if i make a knife for buttering bread and it kills someone because i was careless in my creating of the knife, …

  3. comment
    Comment #15891520

    > A brittle blade that was made to save money but shatters and slices flesh on a bone was an ethical impact. by that logic, basically every decision we ever make has an ethical imp…

  4. comment
    Comment #15891507

    the fact that i might disagree with it (never said i did by the way), would suggest that others might disagree with it, would suggest it is definitively controversial. a lot of the…

  5. comment
    Comment #15891443

    > There is no ethical impact of my job; I build technological systems and it’s up to others how they use them. well that's certainly a controversial way to start a list. does being…

  6. comment
    Comment #15886410

    the reason i am being downvoted is because hacker news is fucking garbage now. too many insecure, underqualified jackasses looking for a reason to argue.

  7. comment
    Comment #15882525

    and saying "they have an app" is ignoring OP's actual point, which is all i am trying to defend. no one is calling into question the merit it's taken to build Shazam as a company. …

  8. comment
    Comment #15882448

    what is your point? saying the algorithm "wouldn't work" without an app is like saying my door doesn't work without a doorknob. OP made a point: Shazam is not magic, and people hav…

  9. comment
    Comment #15882395

    it’s just a button. and in a perfect world I wouldn’t even need a button

  10. comment
    Comment #15835456

    and the ones you do...

  11. comment
    Comment #15793423

    thread i participated in yesterday would suggest about half of HN welcomes it with open arms.

  12. comment
    Comment #15787522

    my only point is that however you interpret the article, pivoting your response towards mocking conspiracy theorists speaks more towards a personal peeve than an objective analysis…

  13. comment
    Comment #15787396

    i don't think your analogy is strong. but instead of continuing to mince words... s/*/plan/ for literally whatever word you choose. and my point stands. discussed? evaluated? none …

  14. comment
    Comment #15787350

    sorry, I’ve edited the word “planned” into my post as to not seem misleading. (forgive me for paraphrasing the title of the thread incorrectly). unsurprisingly, it doesn’t actually…

  15. comment
    Comment #15787302

    “a provocation operation in which Soviet aircraft would appear to attack US or friendly installations to provide an excuse for U.S. intervention” what is that, if not a fake attack…

  16. comment
    Comment #15787150

    news report confirms another instance of the US planning fake attacks on its own citizens for political purposes and your response is to chastise conspiracy theorists? your frustra…

  17. comment
    Comment #15777272

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/06/politics/donald-trump-koi-pond... https://gizmodo.com/that-viral-photo-of-president-trump-dump... an honest question, do your content police block CNN…

  18. comment
    Comment #15777166

    dude. i get it. you are only further articulating everything i have already accused you of. you want a company or government to decide what content gets blocked. that is what's par…

  19. comment
    Comment #15777119

    how substantial of you. your post may have been of some value if i didn't indicate i was being coy. alas, i was asking for elaboration on his opinion. not your canned response.

  20. comment
    Comment #15777111

    ok. read the whole article. and i understood you right off the bat just fine. you want to block fiction from the internet. specifically, political fiction. and to be really generou…

  21. comment
    Comment #15777001

    > "real fake news" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slope or (to play coy): you're suggesting we block fiction from the internet...?

  22. comment
    Comment #15776983

    come on. read between the lines. i'm saying that blocking websites is fascist behavior, not noble work. don't abuse your family's trust by imposing political censorship on them.

  23. comment
    Comment #15776962

    their use of "but" would suggest OP is definitely talking about Mozilla

  24. comment
    Comment #15776939

    in addition to the closet racists, the last election seems to be outing the closet fascists.

  25. comment
    Comment #15776331

    yea, but we're not talking about the rest of the world in this thread, are we? also seems a little misguided to defend to a generalization with another generalization. no? lighten …