Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — catlifeonmars

catlifeonmars

HN member
Joined
Sun, Apr 07, 2019, 2:09 PM UTC
HN karma
1,863
Public activity
1,337 items

About catlifeonmars

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49235356

    I don’t agree with the implication that there has to be a practical reason to learn new things. I enjoy learning new technologies because it’s fun.

  2. comment
    Comment #49191904

    Agreed that many of the articles claims are a bit weak. One point is reasonably strong though: symmetric crypto may not be breakable (battle tested).

  3. comment
    Comment #49191853

    Perhaps, but it’s still trivially easy to increase the difficulty of factorization problems on classical computers, We need a machine that can run Shor’s algorithm before integer f…

  4. comment
    Comment #49157656

    Code quality at one point in time is useful, but what you want is dependability over time and responsiveness to security fixes; this means looking at the maintainer and their atten…

  5. comment
    Comment #49156939

    Don’t good generals know how everyone else in their army does their jobs? At the very least to the extent they can see through the bullshit. For example, I don’t handwrite the code…

  6. comment
    Comment #49145449

    A lot of the vulnerabilities being discovered are low hanging fruit. An LLM could discover them, but so could a human. Let me amend your statement: If the industry most seasoned ex…

  7. comment
    Comment #49105216

    > I'm not going to pretend I know how to do Github better than Github To be fair, there are lots of forges that are better than GitHub; knowing how to GitHub better than GitHub is …

  8. comment
    Comment #49097093

    People who use machines based on the von Neumann architecture?

  9. comment
    Comment #49084870

    How would you enforce a single implementation of path parsing?

  10. comment
    Comment #49084322

    Most people on earth don’t make $200/mo.

  11. comment
    Comment #49062363

    Source? > it's not like they haven't thought about doing the obvious.

  12. comment
    Comment #49022451

    Legal ambiguity tends to have a chilling effect. Although I think this is overshadowed by hype at the moment.

  13. comment
    Comment #48954580

    Cam shafts predate them.

  14. comment
    Comment #48942509

    Let me put it this way. How does the model know what it finds confusing? I’m sure it works great fwiw, also the use of a hot cache is clever.

  15. comment
    Comment #48934863

    That’s not the use case of the tailscale daemon though, which was using getent passwd. To clarify: I’m not against CGO, just introducing a glibc dependency by default. I would only…

  16. comment
    Comment #48934815

    Theory. I guess my question is: why do you think it works so well. What’s the mechanism behind it? It feels like it would be relatively random across the range of plausible results…

  17. comment
    Comment #48929769

    You won’t get grounded results by asking for feedback. The LLM doesn’t know its own internal state so while you may get a plausible and contextually significant answer, it isn’t go…

  18. comment
    Comment #48920809

    Others have pointed out that os/user.Lookup is a platform-independent way to resolve this, but additionally you don’t _need_ to link against glibc to use it. If you are writing go,…

  19. comment
    Comment #48916411

    “--“ doesn’t work on all versions of getent. A better fix is to call “getent passwd” with no user controlled arguments and then parse the resulting list. This gets rid of the input…

  20. comment
    Comment #48901361

    Do you use git reflog?

  21. comment
    Comment #48901352

    What does it mean to split a branch in two?

  22. comment
    Comment #48901316

    Looks like a strategy for storing a secret across multiple servers such that no single node compromise will result in the secret being compromised. My read is that this adds networ…

  23. comment
    Comment #48895117

    Hmm this is a problem that has long been solved with code completion in a JSON language server and a valid JSON schema. By this I mean that you can basically tab-complete your way …

  24. comment
    Comment #48873186

    The justification in TFA smell like premature optimization. A nominal bottleneck is just that-nominal. It’s a good thing to keep in your back pocket but you generally don’t want to…

  25. comment
    Comment #48873066

    Maybe there were other factors? Maybe they were leaning towards leaving anyway and this influx of cash enabled them to do so? It’s a stupid idea, for sure, but I think the explanat…