Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — cataflutter

cataflutter

HN member
Joined
Wed, Apr 01, 2026, 7:11 PM UTC
HN karma
41
Public activity
23 items

About cataflutter

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48642192

    This is going to be very geographically dependent, surely?

  2. comment
    Comment #48641938

    Some of the inference engines can process multiple requests in parallel more efficiently than doing them sequentially. Not sure of the exact mechanism but e.g. llama.cpp's llama-se…

  3. comment
    Comment #48514479

    They have a presence in London; have met someone who works there. Sounds like there is an office too

  4. comment
    Comment #48034335

    Disk space is one thing, but the actual download size is higher than some people's data allowances altogether! It baffles me that a lot of people don't seem to be aware of this

  5. comment
    Comment #48034281

    Disagreed; it's not a download you'd expect and it's also at least an order or two of magnitude than you'd expect to find reasonable for browsing a page. I have a 2GB mobile data p…

  6. comment
    Comment #48010820

    Probably explains it, but one wonders why this page would need WebGL at all. It's not like it's a rich graphical application... is it? :)

  7. comment
    Comment #47987921

    Worth noting that NVIDIA confidential computing and similar schemes have been compromised and shouldn't be relied upon if it really matters. See https://tee.fail/ and similar.

  8. comment
    Comment #47945807

    > the function signature is what they read, but the scars are what they need. This feels like a golden quote. Don't know if you intended for it to rhyme, but well done :D

  9. comment
    Comment #47938869

    A while ago I checked this out and the homepage looked like it had fallen to the 'AI hype' trend, you know like how everything was 'AI-native XYZ for Autonomous Agents' at the time…

  10. comment
    Comment #47861257

    they don't restrict you to using their opencode agent, you can use go in any other agent

  11. comment
    Comment #47763326

    Weird; I clicked through out of curiosity and didn't get any corruption of the sort in the end result. I also asked it some technical details about how diffusion LLMs could work an…

  12. comment
    Comment #47763179

    that said the documentation is rough, especially for their support for non-React frameworks

  13. comment
    Comment #47762985

    Do you have anywhere for people to follow the developments? :)

  14. comment
    Comment #47762952

    Do you have anywhere people can follow out of interest? :)

  15. comment
    Comment #47762922

    This looks really excellent, looking forward to giving it a try, thank you for sharing!

  16. comment
    Comment #47762889

    Sounds interesting, but if I may: the website is exceedingly sluggish, something like 1-2s interval between re-renders when trying to scroll the page (Firefox Linux). Not seeing an…

  17. comment
    Comment #47762797

    This looks very nifty, I will check it out and consider using it after I can understand the underlying primitives :) Thanks for sharing!

  18. comment
    Comment #47762511

    I was going to use Firecracker in an untrusted code execution project (not AI stuff); any chance you'd be happy to elaborate a bit on how you found it a pain to use? Thanks :)

  19. comment
    Comment #47756539

    `WHERE status = 'pending'` is not enough to avoid the performance problem, even if you have an index on `(status)`, because the index will still contain dead tuples until it is vac…

  20. comment
    Comment #47734042

    For disk usage, yes this doesn't address anything. But for read performance (which is IMO what the section in the article was motivated by), it doesn't actually matter to have a bu…

  21. comment
    Comment #47733308

    Decent article, but some remarks: 1) It seems these two statements conflict with each other: > The oldest such transaction sets the cutoff—referred to as the "MVCC horizon." Until …

  22. comment
    Comment #47698842

    I have now been waiting 2 months for a response to a similar problem. Thanks for the reminder about it, it's time to dig out the chargebacks...

  23. comment
    Comment #47605209

    Maybe what the parent commenter was referring to is that recently CloudFlare have published multiple vibe-code demo blog posts whilst trying to pass it off as production grade, for…