Viewing profile — casparvitch
casparvitch
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Oct 17, 2021, 9:44 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 105
- Public activity
- 64 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About casparvitch
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49066384
Have never seen 27-7, as someone in rest-of-world
-
comment
Comment #47527851
I have been thinking about the difference between 'consumption' and 'creation' style hobbies lately. Spending time drinking different coffee beans, or collecting sneakers, I would …
- story
-
comment
Comment #46613048
I agree with this wholeheartedly! Even something a small as fixing up some horrific diverged orphaned git history can help me on a hobby project. And the fact that I see the comman…
-
comment
Comment #46611697
Would love this as an audio visualizer
-
comment
Comment #46608721
I've found in (EU) academia at least that people essentially lie about how much work they do. In anglosphere it's far more common for people to be open/expectant of 80 hour weeks e…
-
comment
Comment #46572337
> A possibly complementary take is that maybe mediums also just... have shelf lives? Like, if there's been no innovation in radio dramas or still life paintings of flowers or super…
- comment
-
story
AI's Memorization Crisis
https://archive.md/xitDT
-
comment
Comment #46551906
More inference = more cost (to Anthropic)
-
comment
Comment #46550713
It appears [0] there is now a fix/workaround (?) [0] https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode-anthropic-auth/pull/11
-
comment
Comment #46550688
I doubt you can opt out
-
comment
Comment #46550644
Oh you mean literally claude code, not some hack like opencode? I guess that makes sense yeah, given the tmux interface.
-
comment
Comment #46550637
There's just not that much IP in a UI like that. Every day we get articles on here that you can make an agent in 200 LOCs, Yegge's gas town in 2 weeks, etc. Training the model is t…
-
comment
Comment #46550434
I guess one issue is that you pay $200/month whether you use it or not. Potentially this could be better for Anthropic. What was not necessarily foreseeable (ok maybe it was) back …
-
comment
Comment #46550276
Is it that it's the best coding tool or the best model? I still get the best (most accurate) results out of anthropic models (but not out of CC).
-
comment
Comment #46550189
Yeah fair, I could've chosen better words. My conclusion is: "I don't want to pay for that", not "they shouldn't be able to do that".
-
comment
Comment #46550159
Unsure of the other competition, but I can vouch for synthetic.new's subscription for GLM (+ other open models). Note quite as accurate as Anthropic's models but good enough for ba…
-
comment
Comment #46550123
IDK if Anthropic wants to offer a service at below cost, I don't think they should gate keep which client you access that service over. Or in other terms, I won't use a service tha…
-
comment
Comment #46550093
Maybe Anthropic saw Yegge's gas town concept and got scared off?
-
comment
Comment #46296328
> My very personal opinion is bureaucracy, fat bureaucracy, damned bureaucracy, expensive bureaucracy: believing you can have a better world by regulations IS stupid, and so on... …
-
comment
Comment #46296048
> There's an entire parallel scientific corpus most western researches never see. Most of the scientific corpus (I would wager >99%) is not read by anyone. At least in physics, all…
-
comment
Comment #46269051
recutils is aimed at database rather than config use-cases
- story
-
comment
Comment #46201335
Statistical algorithms always make more concrete assumptions of the signal. DFT / Fourier transforms are great as they are a direct mathematical operation, that maps neatly to (bas…