Viewing profile — carlwgeorge
carlwgeorge
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jul 21, 2022, 4:23 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 26
- Public activity
- 39 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About carlwgeorge
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #46370476
The source trees in a form suitable for modification (and pull requests) are here: https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms
-
comment
Comment #46297270
It's not a totally different distro, it's a different variant of the same distro. Back when I was on the release team I would create builds, release them in CentOS Stream 8, then a…
-
comment
Comment #46297256
CentOS Stream has major versions and EOL dates, and thus is not a rolling release. It functions as the RHEL major version branch and follows the RHEL compatibility rules, so it's t…
-
comment
Comment #46284953
It warms my heart to see someone else recognize this. The bug-for-bug model that classic CentOS Linux followed was fundamentally broken. Sure there were lots of consumers, but with…
-
comment
Comment #45300226
Mesa is kept current enough in CentOS that a backport isn't necessary. It's currently at version 25.0.7, same as Fedora 41.
-
comment
Comment #45300165
Each version of CentOS Stream is maintained for about 5.5 years, plenty to qualify as an LTS and significantly longer than Fedora (the base for non-LTS Bluefin).
-
comment
Comment #45240472
> Heaven forbid you run RHEL on RHEL in containers, you’re gonna get fleeced. You can run unlimited RHEL containers on a subscribed RHEL system. It's even set up where if you run a…
-
comment
Comment #45235121
> But you skip over that. It's pretty common to reply to specific aspects of a comment. That's what the markdown quote notation is for (even if it doesn't render properly on this s…
-
comment
Comment #45219338
> Around the same time, Red Hat discontinued its free Red Hat Linux and replaced it with the paid-for Red Hat Enterprise Linux and the free, unsupported Fedora Core. This is a comm…
-
comment
Comment #44090605
Then why does this article give "special thanks" to Fedora, but not Red Hat? Or point out the fact that the vast majority of the Fedora RISC-V porting work is being done by Red Hat…
-
comment
Comment #43974398
Ubuntu Pro and RHEL are both 10 years for their standard lifecycle, with optional add-ons to go longer. Ubuntu's is called "Legacy Support" to get an extra 2 years, RHEL's is calle…
-
comment
Comment #43798781
> Kind of like how RHEL used to still provide contributions to CentOS for a long time (although I think that ended at some point too). RHEL contributes to CentOS now more than ever…
-
comment
Comment #43664361
DNF didn't start as a competitive fork of Yum, it started as the Python 3 rewrite of Yum from the same developers. It was really just Yum version 4, using a different name so it co…
-
comment
Comment #43648421
This blog post uses a really weak report as the source for its information. The survey used for the report only got 433 responses. Based on the percentages given in the report, RHE…
-
comment
Comment #43443628
That doesn't show any actual FIPS certificate numbers. Neither does the top link. If CIQ has any FIPS certificates I can't image why they wouldn't list them prominently to remove a…
-
comment
Comment #43443417
The planning to swap the RHEL/CentOS relationship (i.e. CentOS Stream) long predated even the "intent to acquire" announcement from IBM, and of course the actual acquisition as wel…
-
comment
Comment #43409313
CentOS is not a rolling release. It has major versions and EOL dates.
-
comment
Comment #43215899
So you say "it would be easy and seamless", but did you ever actually do it and upgrade to RHEL? Because most people throw that out as a supposed sales pipeline that was lost, but …
-
comment
Comment #43215849
You created an alt account with "centos" in the name just to complain about CentOS. Yeah, it's the hatters that are the weird ones here.
-
comment
Comment #43215820
If you're running cutting edge datacenter hardware, CentOS is a better fit now than it ever has been before. It will be the first to get support for new hardware within a major ver…
-
comment
Comment #43215771
It's the same major version, so it's extremely compatible. Plus if you run into something that doesn't work the same, you just discovered what's going to break for your workload on…
-
comment
Comment #43215747
People that actually care about the distro being sustainable are quite happy with the changes. Sorry you don't get it.
-
comment
Comment #43215741
To call it "completely different" is false. They are built differently, but the end result is still 90-95% the same software versions (because it has to be as the major version of …
-
comment
Comment #43215647
For testing environments Red Hat will literally give them free RHEL. Problem solved.
-
comment
Comment #42969568
Red Hat pays more people to work on open source than any other company I'm aware of. I am one of these people. I challenge you to find a single open source project included in a Re…