Viewing profile — card_zero
card_zero
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Jan 28, 2024, 9:23 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 3,831
- Public activity
- 2,611 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About card_zero
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49219143
I switched to Windows in the year 2000, or 2002, around then. It used to be cool because "the app is just a file that you can place anywhere, or trash when done" was true. They arr…
-
comment
Comment #49217744
But the next generation of "a people" are not the same people, and perhaps those people won't, and then where's your "step aside"?
-
comment
Comment #49217718
Opinions aren't genetic, so that's not very good logic. I guess the logic depends on a culture passing on a value - by means of words, not by genetics - such as spawn furiously to …
-
comment
Comment #49215594
If "take from the poor and give to the rich" means just don't tax the rich so much, that's a mischaracterization of taking and giving.
-
comment
Comment #49170804
Yeah yeah, no aesthetic preferences are ever bad, sure. Heard it, don't believe it. Your thing sucks, sometimes that's just a fact.
-
comment
Comment #49170105
Joke needs tweaking to take into account that all large bronze sculptures are hollow.
-
comment
Comment #49169957
Thrift was formerly a word for profits, now it makes sense. But I recognize the snowclone as a popular 16th century way to form personal verb-noun descriptors like cutpurse, upstar…
-
comment
Comment #49163676
"about all of us when it comes to things we are not very competent at", according to the article.
-
comment
Comment #49161311
Huh? The point is that the two graphs come out looking the same, making the original no more meaningful than random. Source code is here: https://github.com/pem725/Dunning-Kruger (…
-
comment
Comment #49145462
OK, but you didn't apparently read the post you replied to, which says "by mistake, and didn’t even realize".
-
comment
Comment #49139669
That is opposite, not the same.
-
comment
Comment #49135935
How do you feel about a fleuron dinkus?
-
comment
Comment #49135683
It's like saying I am intimately involved in the printer's art. This is usually not true, unless you're involved with a very niche publisher who still has a box of sorts and inky f…
-
comment
Comment #49135601
Speaking as a fucker, I think the use of em-dashes has been pretentious since the 1890s. The rise of typewriters destroyed em-dashes already. The LLMs subsequently created an accid…
-
comment
Comment #49135369
That's reasonable, except "It can be dealt with by cultural understandings of any imagery shifting, and a general return to older (not unprecedented) information environments". Wha…
-
comment
Comment #49135114
It's not very goord.
-
comment
Comment #49130706
I agree that rigorous logic shouldn't be assumed to get us closer to Ultimate Objective Truth than other forms of reasoning. It just gets us whatever peculiar oddments we can disco…
-
comment
Comment #49124160
This sounds kind of like unreadable code, though. So it's more than just taste.
-
comment
Comment #49117933
I know the UK has a lot of wind and solar, and then there's short transport distances: those other countries are famous for hauling goods over long distances through sparsely popul…
-
comment
Comment #49114533
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #49072283
The Toilet Duck brand exists in English. Canard-WC in French, even.
-
comment
Comment #49071067
Derivative works? That seems to translate as "because the books are digitized, it's strange and new and we can't allow it".
-
comment
Comment #49063825
Do you not have values, and evaluate the things you might choose to do, by light of those? Do you not seek local importance, and meaning, as you strive to do your best by those val…
-
comment
Comment #49061954
It's fine, I got a conversation, that's all I wanted. Thank you, by the way. No, I won't modify my behavior. :) Re: the definition, that's exactly what I said in the first place! "…
-
comment
Comment #49061893
But those describe a different thing. I use "mutual preference" carefully. Dale Carnegie described this in 1936. I don't remember what term he used for it, if any. But instead of a…