Viewing profile — captainepoch
captainepoch
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Jan 16, 2024, 11:15 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 100
- Public activity
- 30 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About captainepoch
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47993474
> There was no ill intent by evil corporation, but rather a desire to support functionality that some customers expect of VS Code w.r.t. AI-generated code. As folks mentioned here …
-
comment
Comment #45335300
Ladybird is doomed with this.
-
comment
Comment #45299184
I hope Brave deletes this from Chromium if it's present in the source code.
-
comment
Comment #45112427
It's useful, but it's a meaningless feature. We've been asking for a good JS and HTML engine, faster than what Firefox uses, and for better compatibility with websites (there are w…
-
comment
Comment #45106464
So... Nothing really useful or what users are asking for a long time... And we then ask why people aren't using Firefox...
-
comment
Comment #45106452
I moved long ago, I don't regret anything.
-
comment
Comment #45099766
For now, there isn't an alternative. Maybe a Pixel phone and GrapheneOS with the sandboxed Play Store would be the only choice, but for now, nobody knows.
-
comment
Comment #45080468
If you want a hardened version of Firefox, download LibreWolf.
-
comment
Comment #45036516
> Where in the real world is anonymity considered ok? It should be everywhere, no matter the place or the platform.
-
comment
Comment #44944764
The day people stop inventing stuff like that and they put the same effort in do really good, quality code... That day, we might start having decent software and not Electron or Re…
-
comment
Comment #44581873
The only thing Mozilla has right now better than Chrome is that the APIs needed for uBlock Origin to work as intented exist.
-
comment
Comment #44581852
I think exactly the same. It's always the same play. I guess they don't want to listen to things they need to pour money into.
-
comment
Comment #44581845
Read the comments from Lio and skywal_l, both replies to your comment <- that's what I mean.
-
comment
Comment #44578741
So... Here's an idea: stop wasting time and money on things like that, listen to the community, hire engineers, and make a browser that can be at the same level as Chrome. We alrea…
-
comment
Comment #44549318
Mozilla has already millions of dollars than can be put into Firefox's development instead of the business they're getting into. It doesn't need even more money, it just needs to p…
-
comment
Comment #42948744
I hope they use the money to improve all the issues people have arised over the years. It can be a really good platform, if they're open to change. Otherwise, it might be dead in t…
-
comment
Comment #42823713
No faith on a piece of software of the author of the now abandoned Pixelfed, a software that is not finished and still very buggy.
-
comment
Comment #42762019
Pure Bluesky endorsement from a MIT blog. ActivityPub, Pleroma and Mastodon existed before this, and they just work.
-
comment
Comment #42761993
> 1) A Twitter clone without the political baggage and chaos of the current Twitter ownership. Not the current, but the previous one when Dorsey owned Twitter. And I don't know wha…
-
comment
Comment #42754021
Cool. Now, in Europe, please.
-
comment
Comment #42711932
Hope they do that worldwide soon too!
-
comment
Comment #42704204
> It seems very cool that you can roll back in the case of a catastrophic upgrade failure, but has that every happened to you? Not me. It did, and thanks to that rollback feature, …
-
comment
Comment #42694300
It's not. Open Source has its own definition. You can define however you want, but it's not Open Source. What you mean is "source available".
-
comment
Comment #42635554
React is a web framework. You can put Native behind React, it'll never be.
-
comment
Comment #42635340
For the love of God, stop putting "Native" in web frameworks. No, React will never be native.