Viewing profile — calebio
calebio
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Mar 02, 2012, 7:42 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 425
- Public activity
- 118 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About calebio
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49023719
Hey look, the lawn darts are now AI-controlled.
-
comment
Comment #48865735
Google/Waymo + Uber/Otto comes to mind here with Anthony Levandowski.
-
comment
Comment #48633326
I think there's a middle ground of people who just are not interested in building or upgrading a gaming computer (or just don't like their typical form factor in the ready to go ou…
-
comment
Comment #48633185
Did you just stop scrolling at the first group of people to come and make this comment?
-
comment
Comment #48603896
You can easily burn through hundreds of dollars researching one or two relatively small court cases. I don't think you should be indigent or go to the courthouse/public library to …
-
comment
Comment #48603877
Stalking has a specific definition that I'm not sure would apply here. Your behavior on the internet is certainly tracked by corporations. Your phone's radio addresses were (are) t…
-
comment
Comment #48603859
No, it's not. You are not protected from a private company that owns ALPRs as part of the 4th amendment. The government purchasing data from 3rd parties (the third-party doctrine) …
-
comment
Comment #48603817
> That's not what I'm seeing. My mom always wanted Google to just answer questions, and now ChatGPT can. She uses it enough in her daily life that she bought a subscription. Remind…
-
comment
Comment #48587791
> A lower resolution tracking is still tracking though. Spatial resolution is low/fixed doesn’t change the fact that I was tagged using the personally identifiable plate and my mov…
-
comment
Comment #48587460
I think the question may instead be: > do you have the right to not have [a private company] tracking your movements and keeping logs of everywhere you’ve been for months or years,…
-
comment
Comment #48586886
While Carpenter v. United States (2018) somewhat changed the rules regarding the "purchase" of third-party data in the context of an investigation, it seems like the ALPRs do not v…
-
comment
Comment #48497034
The L-Taraval, at least historically, was not reliable between downtown and the outer sunset (past Sunset Blvd).
-
comment
Comment #47758255
Any idea if/when this would be coming to GHE? I know the release cycle is way different but curious about your thoughts.
-
comment
Comment #47758225
I miss the Phabricator review UI so much.
-
comment
Comment #47253294
Have they even filed the forms yet or is this another instance of "let's tweet a thing and let some of the public believe Y (new) while X (old) is actually still true"?
-
comment
Comment #47252634
Historically, availability was very different between the two countries when we're specifically talking about purchasing SIMs for questionable activity. Physically acquiring the SI…
-
comment
Comment #47251140
Not a direct answer to your reuqestion re: questionable activity, but for me it's more about ease of access. A SIM in the U.S. is significantly more difficult to acquire than a SIM…
-
comment
Comment #46132958
> The 1994 paper (freely available at https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1341727/m2/ ...) is actually about proper E2EE. That paper is about PKI-based session setup f…
-
comment
Comment #46132624
It wasn't coined, it was reused. It historically meant things that were encrypted from the client to the server, e.g. SSH, SSL, TLS, etc. RFC 4949 (Internet Security Glossary, Vers…
-
comment
Comment #46132524
I'll take the hit on the loose phrasing regarding the SSL paper "outlining plans". That was a poor description of mine of an analysis paper and wasn't a good example of the point I…
-
comment
Comment #46130708
> No, before that it was simply not a term, except in some obscure radio protocol > no one really used the E2EE term before it got the current meaning It most certainly was a term …
-
comment
Comment #46130688
Well respectfully your recollection is missing lots of references by people that were "knowledgeable in cryptography". You can easily find these references in the literature, often…
-
comment
Comment #46130024
The modern usage of E2EE definitely means that "the server cannot access it". That's the meat of this entire discussion. While you are technically correct in a network topology sen…
-
comment
Comment #46129999
It was pretty common to call client-side encryption/SSL "end to end encryption" among network engineers who were analyzing data flowing through their networks[0] as well as those w…
-
comment
Comment #46129849
I think part of the problem is that prior to WhatsApp's E2EE implementation in like 2014, TLS was very often called "End to End Encryption" as the ends were Client and Server/Servi…