Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — ca508

ca508

HN member
Joined
Mon, Aug 02, 2021, 5:52 PM UTC
HN karma
54
Public activity
20 items

About ca508

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #44041002

    been following engine from afar for a while, super cool to see it on HN. didn't see it had a free plan, will try it out.

  2. comment
    Comment #43484507

    Yep! We have two roles open https://railway.com/careers#open-positions - Datacenters and Infra that might be of interest to you. Idk if many of us use LinkedIn so not the best way …

  3. comment
    Comment #43478146

    > the dots aren’t connected between a lot of the aspects presented that's on me (author); I tried to cut the content down to a manageable post size that covered some interesting st…

  4. comment
    Comment #43478128

    Author here; RAM is so much more expensive than disk though. Two 500G M.2 NVMes for a RootFS in RAID1 are basically max ~$150 which is I think much cheaper than a single 64G DDR5 E…

  5. comment
    Comment #43478039

    author here; Claude use here was pure laziness - and personally, I found it quite funny that it worked. We could sample pixels and try and build that detection, but $ Maybe it need…

  6. comment
    Comment #42749415

    There's a fork called nautobot that tries to add-in automation. Most things we wanted to do with either meant we had to go writing django plugins and trying to interface with their…

  7. comment
    Comment #42749323

    It's a fair question. What Oxide are building is cool, but it's too custom/monolithic for us to risk. We're more likely to look at OCP racks/chassis down the road.

  8. comment
    Comment #42749293

    We currently pass on our cloud egress costs to users via the current pricing. We'll be publishing a pricing update soon as part of our migration - and egress [and some other things…

  9. comment
    Comment #42745516

    We have a distributor we work with - just because it makes import/export a lot easier. But we get to interface directly with Supermicro for the technical/design stuff, and they're …

  10. comment
    Comment #42745458

    the good news on this is that we've got a tonne of deep-dive material on networking and whitebox switches we cut from this post. We'll definitely be talking more about this soon (a…

  11. comment
    Comment #42744989

    correct; I think the first version of our tool sprung up in the space of a couple of weekends. It wasn't planned, my colleague Pierre who wrote it just had a lot of fun building it…

  12. comment
    Comment #42744971

    We talked to a few, I think they're called MSPs? We weren't super impressed. We decided to YOLO it. There are probably great outfits out there, but it's hard to find them through t…

  13. comment
    Comment #42744870

    All valid points - and our ideas for Gen 2 sound directionally similar - but those are at crayon drawing stage. When we started, we didn't have much of an idea about what the rack …

  14. comment
    Comment #42744740

    ah that's my bad - I wrote this in Dec, we only published in Jan. Obv. missed updating that. Timeline wise; - we decided to go for it and spend the $$$ in Oct '23 - Convos/planning…

  15. comment
    Comment #42744552

    oh yes we want to; I even priced a couple out. Most of the SKUs I found were pretty old, and we couldn't find anything compelling to risk deploying at the scale we wanted. It's on …

  16. comment
    Comment #42744454

    Long running hosts at the moment, but we can drain most workloads off a specific host/rack if required and reschedule it pretty fast. We have the advantage of having a custom sched…

  17. comment
    Comment #42744318

    we evaluated a lot of commercial and oss offerings before we decided do go build it ourselves - we still have a deploy of netbox somewhere. But our custom tool (Railyard) works so …

  18. comment
    Comment #42744133

    > It would be nice to have a lot more detail I'm going to save this for when I'm asked to cut the three paras on power circuit types. Re: standardising layout at the rack level; we…

  19. comment
    Comment #42743979

    We didn't find many good up-to-date resources online on the hardware side of things - kinda why we wanted to write about it. The networking aspect was the most mystical - I highly …

  20. comment
    Comment #42743901

    We built some internal tooling to help manage the hosts. Once a host is onboarded onto it, it's a few button clicks on an internal dashboard to provision a QEMU VM. We made a custo…