Viewing profile — ca508
ca508
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Aug 02, 2021, 5:52 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 54
- Public activity
- 20 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About ca508
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #44041002
been following engine from afar for a while, super cool to see it on HN. didn't see it had a free plan, will try it out.
-
comment
Comment #43484507
Yep! We have two roles open https://railway.com/careers#open-positions - Datacenters and Infra that might be of interest to you. Idk if many of us use LinkedIn so not the best way …
-
comment
Comment #43478146
> the dots aren’t connected between a lot of the aspects presented that's on me (author); I tried to cut the content down to a manageable post size that covered some interesting st…
-
comment
Comment #43478128
Author here; RAM is so much more expensive than disk though. Two 500G M.2 NVMes for a RootFS in RAID1 are basically max ~$150 which is I think much cheaper than a single 64G DDR5 E…
-
comment
Comment #43478039
author here; Claude use here was pure laziness - and personally, I found it quite funny that it worked. We could sample pixels and try and build that detection, but $ Maybe it need…
-
comment
Comment #42749415
There's a fork called nautobot that tries to add-in automation. Most things we wanted to do with either meant we had to go writing django plugins and trying to interface with their…
-
comment
Comment #42749323
It's a fair question. What Oxide are building is cool, but it's too custom/monolithic for us to risk. We're more likely to look at OCP racks/chassis down the road.
-
comment
Comment #42749293
We currently pass on our cloud egress costs to users via the current pricing. We'll be publishing a pricing update soon as part of our migration - and egress [and some other things…
-
comment
Comment #42745516
We have a distributor we work with - just because it makes import/export a lot easier. But we get to interface directly with Supermicro for the technical/design stuff, and they're …
-
comment
Comment #42745458
the good news on this is that we've got a tonne of deep-dive material on networking and whitebox switches we cut from this post. We'll definitely be talking more about this soon (a…
-
comment
Comment #42744989
correct; I think the first version of our tool sprung up in the space of a couple of weekends. It wasn't planned, my colleague Pierre who wrote it just had a lot of fun building it…
-
comment
Comment #42744971
We talked to a few, I think they're called MSPs? We weren't super impressed. We decided to YOLO it. There are probably great outfits out there, but it's hard to find them through t…
-
comment
Comment #42744870
All valid points - and our ideas for Gen 2 sound directionally similar - but those are at crayon drawing stage. When we started, we didn't have much of an idea about what the rack …
-
comment
Comment #42744740
ah that's my bad - I wrote this in Dec, we only published in Jan. Obv. missed updating that. Timeline wise; - we decided to go for it and spend the $$$ in Oct '23 - Convos/planning…
-
comment
Comment #42744552
oh yes we want to; I even priced a couple out. Most of the SKUs I found were pretty old, and we couldn't find anything compelling to risk deploying at the scale we wanted. It's on …
-
comment
Comment #42744454
Long running hosts at the moment, but we can drain most workloads off a specific host/rack if required and reschedule it pretty fast. We have the advantage of having a custom sched…
-
comment
Comment #42744318
we evaluated a lot of commercial and oss offerings before we decided do go build it ourselves - we still have a deploy of netbox somewhere. But our custom tool (Railyard) works so …
-
comment
Comment #42744133
> It would be nice to have a lot more detail I'm going to save this for when I'm asked to cut the three paras on power circuit types. Re: standardising layout at the rack level; we…
-
comment
Comment #42743979
We didn't find many good up-to-date resources online on the hardware side of things - kinda why we wanted to write about it. The networking aspect was the most mystical - I highly …
-
comment
Comment #42743901
We built some internal tooling to help manage the hosts. Once a host is onboarded onto it, it's a few button clicks on an internal dashboard to provision a QEMU VM. We made a custo…