Viewing profile — byteknight
byteknight
HN member- Joined
- Thu, May 04, 2017, 10:57 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,089
- Public activity
- 329 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About byteknight
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #45581274
Never thought about it from that perspective, but I think you're right. It is by design, not deceptive intent, just the infinite monkeys theorem where we've replaced randomness wit…
-
comment
Comment #45554484
May be helpful for others. Fully packaged version https://github.com/IAmStoxe/wirehole
-
comment
Comment #45517411
Seems similar to the problem encountered when making the stupid idea PyNQ: https://github.com/IAmStoxe/PyNQ
-
comment
Comment #45493027
Isn't that specific to pictures?
-
comment
Comment #45465208
Encryption is defined as "the process of converting information or data into a code, especially to prevent unauthorized access." What you describe is the same thing just not crypto…
-
comment
Comment #45028723
Are you doing roleplay?
-
comment
Comment #44941439
Seems so easy! You only need the entire world even tangentially related to video to rely solely on your project for a task and you too can have all the developers you need to work …
-
comment
Comment #44903765
"Just ask AI" is a phrase you will hear around enterprises now. You less often hear "Google it". You hear "ChatGPT it".
-
comment
Comment #44903757
Not sure how that fits. Do you produce good results every time, first try? Didn't think so.
-
comment
Comment #44903104
I think you replied in the wrong place, bud. All the best. EDIT - I see now. sorry. For all intents and purposes of the public. AI == LLM. End of story. Doesn't matter what develop…
-
comment
Comment #44902799
As an American, I obviously can get behind it, but I can easily see how a declared goal of superiority of others would rub those others the wrong way (and possibly prevent their co…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #44902007
I have to disagree. Anyone that says LLMs do not qualify as AI are the same people who will continue to move the goal posts for AGI. "Well it doesn't do this!". No one here is tryi…
-
comment
Comment #44660192
While it is totally nonsensical, as as suggestion as a business practice, I will indulge in the idea as if you are being genuine. You cannot give a gender more money to do the same…
-
comment
Comment #44527583
But in reality, would much more consistently be automated by a single playwright script.
-
comment
Comment #44516325
He rewrote history to hide it? He admits it here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44516104
-
comment
Comment #44481783
Gives a whole new meaning to its always DNS.
-
comment
Comment #44365533
Regardless no one can make you buy anything
-
comment
Comment #44270915
No, zero click requires no interaction from the user. For a hypothetical example simply having a phone on a cellular network and being susceptible to base-band attacks. No interact…
-
comment
Comment #44265248
It bypasses a lot of the checks they do on the initial site when submitting to ad networks. It also allows custom redirections based on user agent, potential ip location, etc. Comm…
-
comment
Comment #44252323
TTS is a very common initialism for Text-to-Speech going back to at least the 90s.
-
comment
Comment #44251620
I have to agree with you. Anything that requires an initiation (a chat in this case) by the user is inherently not "zero-click".
-
comment
Comment #44183914
Amen.
-
comment
Comment #43871169
An optimist I see.
-
comment
Comment #43808022
On what planet is JS better than TS. You ever work with JS?