Viewing profile — bytehamster
bytehamster
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jun 11, 2025, 3:23 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 11
- Public activity
- 6 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About bytehamster
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #46403746
If I understood their first demo correctly, they verified a fedora iso with a detached signature. The booted iso then printed "hello 39c3". https://streaming.media.ccc.de/39c3/reli…
-
comment
Comment #44255823
There is no deserialization time or space overhead. The measurements refer to the deserialized form. They are not loaded from disk. About false positive checks, I think you misunde…
-
comment
Comment #44250025
That sounds super interesting! Do you remember the title or the authors of the paper?
-
comment
Comment #44248973
In the appendix of the survey, there are 3 references on dynamic perfect hashing. I think the only actual implementation of a dynamic PHF is a variant of perfect hashing though fin…
-
comment
Comment #44248934
Addition: BBHash, in turn, is a re-implementation of FiPHa (perfect hashing through fingerprinting). There are quite many re-implementations of FiPHa: BBHash, Boomph, FiPS, FMPH, e…
-
comment
Comment #44248813
Many modern perfect hash functions are super close to the space lower bound, often having just between 3% and 50% overhead. So your claim that the space consumption "twice as low" …