Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — bwesterb

bwesterb

HN member
Joined
Thu, Jan 21, 2016, 2:50 PM UTC
HN karma
109
Public activity
55 items

About bwesterb

https://bas.westerbaan.name/ Post quantum at Cloudflare

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #47962025

    Most approaches have missing "capabilities" that can be tracked. Adam Zalcman lays them out for superconducting qubits here. https://westerbaan.name/~bas/rwpqc2026/adam.pdf For the…

  2. comment
    Comment #47960359

    Scott used to be that guy.

  3. comment
    Comment #47960351

    The abacus thing is pretty funny, but it's dangerously uninformed. https://bas.westerbaan.name/notes/2026/04/02/factoring.html

  4. comment
    Comment #47960262

    It'll be a 90/10 rule: 90% of the upgrades will be straightforward. It's important the 10% that'll be hard early. For many it's probably already too late.

  5. comment
    Comment #47960256

    QKD is cool and all, but it just doesn't scale to the whole Internet. https://blog.cloudflare.com/you-dont-need-quantum-hardware/

  6. comment
    Comment #47960249

    Where available, you can migrate. Even if PQ is not yet available it helps to: 1. Make sure your dependencies are up to date. Move to a recent version of your crypto libraries. 2. …

  7. comment
    Comment #47960209

    We're almost done countering store-now/decrypt-later, but the biggest part of the job, post-quantum authentication, still remains. Like Google, we target 2029 to be done .

  8. comment
    Comment #47960197

    SSH is working on a drop-in as we speak. TLS is further along: most stacks already support X25519MLKEM768 (by default!) to counter store-now/decrypt-later. PQ certs are not widely …

  9. story
  10. comment
    Comment #47689080

    When it's real, it's too late.

  11. comment
    Comment #47689079

    You sure? Defenders get funding if things break—not when they actually did their job.

  12. comment
    Comment #47689052

    Yeah, it's rough. Important to understand now for each product / system what the business impact is if it's not upgraded in time.

  13. comment
    Comment #47689028

    They are large, but they're not that slow actually. We've been testing them for almost a decade now. I agree that rushing is bad. That's why we need to start moving now, so that we…

  14. comment
    Comment #47689008

    Yeah, PQ certificate transparency is crucial for downgrade protection: https://westerbaan.name/~bas/rwpqc2026/bas.pdf

  15. comment
    Comment #47688932

    > I could also be misremembering our conversation, but I thought you had said something like 2029 or 2030 in our 2020 conversation Think that must've been around 2022. It'd have be…

  16. comment
    Comment #47677983

    No need for a TLS 1.4. Leaf certificates don't last long, but root CAs do. An attacker can just mint new certs from a broken root key. Hopefully many devices can be upgraded to PQ …

  17. comment
    Comment #47677868

    Waiting now means rushing even more close to the deadline! We added stats on origin support for post-quantum encryption. Not as much support as browsers of course, but better than …

  18. comment
    Comment #47677274

    If we do our job, it changes nothing. Problem with security generally: no spectacle if it's all correct. :)

  19. comment
    Comment #47677205

    At least it's time bound: hope to have this job done by 2029!

  20. comment
    Comment #47673581

    Don't recognise you from your username, but thanks for the respect. (Update: ah, Vitali! Nice to hear from you.) If you look back at my writing from 2025 and earlier, I'm on the co…

  21. comment
    Comment #47209757

    The key will be 40x larger. Not that bad for the certs. It'll be about 15kB extra. Will depend on your use case if that's bad. For video it's fine. But not all browsing is video. A…

  22. comment
    Comment #47208780

    Also just now Chrome published https://www.chromium.org/Home/chromium-security/post-quantum...

  23. comment
    Comment #47208772

    Yeah, filed https://github.com/mozilla/ssl-config-generator/issues/342

  24. comment
    Comment #47208766

    Merkle Tree Certificates basically uses the same structure as Certificate Transparency today. Merkle Ladder uses a weird variation claimed to be useful to DNSSEC. I think it's rath…

  25. comment
    Comment #45904229

    Client would check perhaps once a day. Similar to how Chrome checks about once a day for urgent revocations.