Viewing profile — buzer
buzer
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Oct 08, 2016, 3:03 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,162
- Public activity
- 443 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About buzer
Especially interested in systems scaling & IAM and also general interest in most of thing on backend side.
You can reach me via @.net
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49249466
My first thought was "huh, I wonder if they follow GDPR, that starts sound to like Article 32 violation" (related to security of processing). I checked the privacy policy and yes, …
-
comment
Comment #49237080
Storing IP address itself is not illegal. The questions are: 1) what is the legal basis for storing it and if that's proper or not (e.g. legitimate interest requires balancing test…
-
comment
Comment #49213002
> If the company decides that a certain user should not see the website, the user will not see the website, and no one will know about it, and the user will have no recourse. If th…
-
comment
Comment #49111016
Of one year. How many years does it take complete the investigation and let courts handle appeals? I assume they do not need to change behavior nor can the fine increase during the…
-
comment
Comment #49090771
That's legalization setback, not court setback.
-
comment
Comment #49089808
Can you be more specific? The only related court cases I'm aware of are U.S. The Crew lawsuit which seems to have reached settlement recently and the French case regarding which I …
-
comment
Comment #49074833
No, it's not. ePD is lex specialis in relation to original Data Protection Directive (and later GDPR). DPD was replaced by GDPR, ePD was not. There has been talks about ePrivacy Re…
-
comment
Comment #49070095
"legitimate interest" is legal basis in GDPR. ePD (which governs access to cookies) does not have such legal basis, only consent and the two exceptions. Other processing (like afte…
-
comment
Comment #49063656
This is actually slightly narrower exception than people (and regulators) think. The exception is: > strictly necessary in order for the provider of an information society service …
-
comment
Comment #49063388
Well, if you presented them with list of 100 partners each with 20 page of privacy policies and they accept it within 10 seconds it should be tricky to argue that user actually rea…
-
comment
Comment #49063341
Legitimate interest is not currently enough to read or write cookies. You need either consent or it must be "strictly necessary in order for the provider of an information society …
-
comment
Comment #48973987
That's uBlock Origin Lite, not uBlock Origin. They are two very different extensions. Lite, for example, does not allow you to add custom filters.
-
comment
Comment #48958369
If someone is in EU and is affected by this they could potentially utilize GDPR to make both Microsoft and LG take responsibility for this. It's hard to say directly from the artic…
-
comment
Comment #48942078
That's good if true. When did it change? I very much do remember that back when the change happened the modal I received didn't actually say anything ( https://news.ycombinator.com…
-
comment
Comment #48941932
No for what? The opt-in for model training? About a year ago Anthropic changed "Allow use of your chats and coding sessions to train and improve Anthropic AI models" to default to …
-
comment
Comment #48941826
Sure, but the point is more that once you submit feedback then the usual "opt out of using my data for training" no longer apply and at least that reply (and possibly whole convers…
-
comment
Comment #48941800
They don't use your general chats it if you have opted out (note: opted out, not opted in). However if you submit feedback then whole conversation can be used. https://help.openai.…
-
comment
Comment #48941103
There are multiple ways to use feedback. Personally I would often be fine with actual human reading my feedback, taking in account the points I made and evaluating how it should af…
-
comment
Comment #48894535
Aren't the cameras on city's land or did city lease the land to Flock? If they are on city's land couldn't city require that Flock removes their stuff from city's property or city …
-
comment
Comment #48864224
It's unfortunately somewhat common these days and personally I actively avoid any place which does this. At least it's only somewhat common rather than the standard so it's still p…
-
comment
Comment #48798957
Personally I do agree, but enforcement is unfortunately behind DPAs and it's pretty clear that they are trying to avoid ruling on it. In theory someone could directly sue some comp…
-
comment
Comment #48796894
Not quite. > This shall not prevent any technical storage or access for the sole purpose of carrying out or facilitating the transmission of a communication over an electronic comm…
-
comment
Comment #48795105
It's called "pay-or-okay" (or "consent-or-pay") and there hasn't been many decisions on it yet which has led noyb to sue German DPAs: https://noyb.eu/en/years-inactivity-pay-or-ok-…
-
comment
Comment #48739021
In 2022 I got physical mail about leaving a review for something I bought from Amazon (sold by company X, shipped by Amazon) in exchange for Amazon Gift Card. It contained the name…
-
comment
Comment #48738852
2 weeks ago it was $60 billion apparently. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48553224 It might be higher now.