Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — buzer

buzer

HN member
Joined
Sat, Oct 08, 2016, 3:03 PM UTC
HN karma
1,162
Public activity
443 items

About buzer

Staff Software Engineer at 8x8

Especially interested in systems scaling & IAM and also general interest in most of thing on backend side.

You can reach me via @.net

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49249466

    My first thought was "huh, I wonder if they follow GDPR, that starts sound to like Article 32 violation" (related to security of processing). I checked the privacy policy and yes, …

  2. comment
    Comment #49237080

    Storing IP address itself is not illegal. The questions are: 1) what is the legal basis for storing it and if that's proper or not (e.g. legitimate interest requires balancing test…

  3. comment
    Comment #49213002

    > If the company decides that a certain user should not see the website, the user will not see the website, and no one will know about it, and the user will have no recourse. If th…

  4. comment
    Comment #49111016

    Of one year. How many years does it take complete the investigation and let courts handle appeals? I assume they do not need to change behavior nor can the fine increase during the…

  5. comment
    Comment #49090771

    That's legalization setback, not court setback.

  6. comment
    Comment #49089808

    Can you be more specific? The only related court cases I'm aware of are U.S. The Crew lawsuit which seems to have reached settlement recently and the French case regarding which I …

  7. comment
    Comment #49074833

    No, it's not. ePD is lex specialis in relation to original Data Protection Directive (and later GDPR). DPD was replaced by GDPR, ePD was not. There has been talks about ePrivacy Re…

  8. comment
    Comment #49070095

    "legitimate interest" is legal basis in GDPR. ePD (which governs access to cookies) does not have such legal basis, only consent and the two exceptions. Other processing (like afte…

  9. comment
    Comment #49063656

    This is actually slightly narrower exception than people (and regulators) think. The exception is: > strictly necessary in order for the provider of an information society service …

  10. comment
    Comment #49063388

    Well, if you presented them with list of 100 partners each with 20 page of privacy policies and they accept it within 10 seconds it should be tricky to argue that user actually rea…

  11. comment
    Comment #49063341

    Legitimate interest is not currently enough to read or write cookies. You need either consent or it must be "strictly necessary in order for the provider of an information society …

  12. comment
    Comment #48973987

    That's uBlock Origin Lite, not uBlock Origin. They are two very different extensions. Lite, for example, does not allow you to add custom filters.

  13. comment
    Comment #48958369

    If someone is in EU and is affected by this they could potentially utilize GDPR to make both Microsoft and LG take responsibility for this. It's hard to say directly from the artic…

  14. comment
    Comment #48942078

    That's good if true. When did it change? I very much do remember that back when the change happened the modal I received didn't actually say anything ( https://news.ycombinator.com…

  15. comment
    Comment #48941932

    No for what? The opt-in for model training? About a year ago Anthropic changed "Allow use of your chats and coding sessions to train and improve Anthropic AI models" to default to …

  16. comment
    Comment #48941826

    Sure, but the point is more that once you submit feedback then the usual "opt out of using my data for training" no longer apply and at least that reply (and possibly whole convers…

  17. comment
    Comment #48941800

    They don't use your general chats it if you have opted out (note: opted out, not opted in). However if you submit feedback then whole conversation can be used. https://help.openai.…

  18. comment
    Comment #48941103

    There are multiple ways to use feedback. Personally I would often be fine with actual human reading my feedback, taking in account the points I made and evaluating how it should af…

  19. comment
    Comment #48894535

    Aren't the cameras on city's land or did city lease the land to Flock? If they are on city's land couldn't city require that Flock removes their stuff from city's property or city …

  20. comment
    Comment #48864224

    It's unfortunately somewhat common these days and personally I actively avoid any place which does this. At least it's only somewhat common rather than the standard so it's still p…

  21. comment
    Comment #48798957

    Personally I do agree, but enforcement is unfortunately behind DPAs and it's pretty clear that they are trying to avoid ruling on it. In theory someone could directly sue some comp…

  22. comment
    Comment #48796894

    Not quite. > This shall not prevent any technical storage or access for the sole purpose of carrying out or facilitating the transmission of a communication over an electronic comm…

  23. comment
    Comment #48795105

    It's called "pay-or-okay" (or "consent-or-pay") and there hasn't been many decisions on it yet which has led noyb to sue German DPAs: https://noyb.eu/en/years-inactivity-pay-or-ok-…

  24. comment
    Comment #48739021

    In 2022 I got physical mail about leaving a review for something I bought from Amazon (sold by company X, shipped by Amazon) in exchange for Amazon Gift Card. It contained the name…

  25. comment
    Comment #48738852

    2 weeks ago it was $60 billion apparently. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48553224 It might be higher now.