Viewing profile — buttaphingas
buttaphingas
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Nov 14, 2021, 7:54 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 6
- Public activity
- 14 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About buttaphingas
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #40195419
Snowflake has some examples of that: https://www.snowflake.com/blog/easy-secure-llm-inference-ret... https://quickstarts.snowflake.com/guide/asking_questions_to_... And I assume th…
-
comment
Comment #37220646
Vendor says their solution is cheaper than competitor solution. I'm shocked.
-
comment
Comment #36917262
Check out 0MQ (ZeroMQ), Informatica Ultra Messaging (formerly 29 West), and aeron.io They create reliable uni/multicast protocols over UDP, including strategies for NAK storms etc.…
-
comment
Comment #32558179
And to get the very best price for those clusters your you'd need to commit to the CSP for three years! Would love to know the TCO trade-off between procuring, securing and deployi…
-
comment
Comment #32558013
It's all around the ethos of ease of use. Snowflake does a lot of smarts in the background so that you don't have the overhead of managing indexes. And not just indexes, there is j…
-
comment
Comment #29258651
They're still lacking things in the SQL space. For example, Databricks say they're ACID compliant, but it's only on a single-table basis. Snowflake offers multi-table ACID consiste…
-
comment
Comment #29252531
But you do still have to secure the S3 buckets, right? And I guess also secure the infrastructure you have to deploy in order to run Databricks. Plus then configure for cross-AZ fa…
-
comment
Comment #29252375
You can use Scala, Java and Python with Snowflake now, as well as process structured, semi-structured and unstructured data. So I guess that means it doesn't fit into the data ware…
-
comment
Comment #29237288
I actually see them as variations on the same architecture. Databricks keeps their metadata in files, Snowflake keeps theirs in a database, but they both, ultimately, are querying …
-
comment
Comment #29236845
Delta is open source, but Databricks keeps optimizations for themselves as proprietary. I'm not sure why it would be any better than Snowflake's solution, which is automatically de…
-
comment
Comment #29234462
Databricks isn't open source, as they keep hold of all the IP that makes it much better than OS Spark. Whether you buy Snowflake or Databricks, you're buying proprietary software.
-
comment
Comment #29222164
The "failover and failback for business continuity" is specifically for cross-region/cloud, i.e. this is something you explicitly have to do. tbh I've never used it, as I guess thi…
-
comment
Comment #29221204
I've used Snowflake for the past few years, and it's worth pointing out that when it comes to overall cost, there's a lot you get with Snowflake for free. For example, they have HA…
-
comment
Comment #29220120
This is incorrect. Every edition of Snowflake is deployed across multiple availability zones with automatic failover in the case of failure or AZ outage. This is included in the pr…