Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — bustermellotron

bustermellotron

HN member
Joined
Thu, Apr 20, 2023, 9:53 AM UTC
HN karma
60
Public activity
11 items

About bustermellotron

Research Software Engineer at the University of Bristol

Erdos number: 2 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.06674)

My dilapidated house: https://www.instagram.com/bristol.victorian.house/

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48403855

    Size of a finite set. It’s common notation in this field.

  2. comment
    Comment #48213751

    The grid of squares actually gets > Cn for any C. (More in fact… C can grow like n^a/loglog(n).) The AI proved > n^{1 + b} for some small b > 0, which a human (Will Sawin) has now …

  3. comment
    Comment #48104427

    You could use air scrubbers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soda_lime

  4. comment
    Comment #48072005

    I saw Tim Gowers give a talk at the AMS-MAA joint meeting in Seattle about ten years ago where he predicted that in 100 years humans would no longer be doing research mathematics. …

  5. comment
    Comment #48032649

    Go go Gadget arms!

  6. comment
    Comment #47084455

    I found it easy to adapt to the x-bows keyboard (column staggered and splayed). The thumb buttons and large ctrl, alt, space are great for emacs. My only complaint is that the brac…

  7. comment
    Comment #40765981

    I think the book "The Now Habit" discusses this well. (Could be another book though...) I once completed a 3000 mile cycling tour across the US (and didn't take ADHD meds while on …

  8. comment
    Comment #35999549

    This covers most of what you need for "housekeeping" scripts in Python: https://automatetheboringstuff.com

  9. comment
    Comment #35645366

    On the other hand, your proof really only needs the binomial theorem and geometric series.

  10. comment
    Comment #35645256

    The “claim” more or less proves that k-1 th root of k is less than 2 if k is larger than 2. So I think your argument is equivalent.

  11. comment
    Comment #35638064

    Here is an elementary proof: Since m and n are distinct, we may assume that m > n >= 2. From the equation and unique factorization, we know that n divides m, so write m = nd. Then …