Viewing profile — bungeonsBaggins
bungeonsBaggins
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Dec 19, 2022, 11:14 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 131
- Public activity
- 26 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About bungeonsBaggins
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #40664649
> You seem legitimately offended that this guy has preferences and opinions No, I am not offended that anyone has preferences or opinions. What I am responding to is this language:…
-
comment
Comment #40663371
What a boner of a comment. We get it, George, you don't watch pornography. Well done on managing your personal brand I guess? FYI there's nothing inherently wrong about porn or sex…
-
comment
Comment #40502318
I think this is a pro-Amazon piece disguised as an anti-Amazon piece. Like, the author comes across as so inept and unlikable, and Amazon so reasonable, that I strongly suspect tha…
-
comment
Comment #39909698
I don't mean to blow your mind, but humans are a part of nature. One advantage we have over other species is that we can spot patterns and work collectively to fix undesirable situ…
-
comment
Comment #39852153
So you think that if you wanted to start a business to compete with Apple in any of the spaces talked about in this lawsuit (hardware, web browsing, messaging etc) your greatest ch…
-
comment
Comment #39842429
> On the other side we see politicians - bureaucrats that never built anything in their lives. Parasites living off our work. Greedier and greedier every year they forcefully confi…
-
comment
Comment #39838768
> Buybacks are a favorite boogeyman, but they are just tax efficient dividends. "Tax-efficient" is weasel language. If the money was spent as dividends it would be taxed and then w…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #37801554
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #37646867
For context, it looks like this user has deleted a comment where they claim they "have a screenshot" of this, but they "don't want to share it" because they "don't want it to make …
-
comment
Comment #37054473
Considering that several people have tried and failed to reproduce this, and there's a warning at the top of the shared conversations about the creator's Custom Instructions, and t…
-
comment
Comment #36992559
> I don't want to feel like a fool for sticking with and supporting this woman from 40-70, when she was giving it up easily at 18-30 jesus
-
comment
Comment #36872554
Yes, this is such a fool's errand. When GPT-4 was first released I started using it as a creative writing aid, and had a wonderful couple of months with it. Yesterday I finally can…
-
comment
Comment #36310742
4chan isn't a village, though, not in the way the author describes. Important characteristics of a "village" as defined in this piece are that you can develop systems of trust thro…
-
comment
Comment #36292436
The Fed is not a single guy. Do you think it's a single guy? Are you just parroting something you heard somewhere else without understanding it?
-
comment
Comment #35949949
I've read some of CS Lewis' writings on religion. I'm an atheist married to a person of faith, so I'm interested in what the people I love find so compelling about their faith. He'…
-
comment
Comment #35666060
In my experience of layoffs, it's more akin to just digging up a tenth of the garden at random because you don't know what a weed looks like.
-
comment
Comment #35358523
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #34695064
It was very reasonable to imagine that if the API ever stopped being free, that the logical next step would be "paid access" rather than "no access". And that if Twitter was going …
-
comment
Comment #34596753
It sounds like you haven't really watched the show. Which is fine, but your criticisms assume too much and miss the mark. For example, this: > And then they try to paint Don as thi…
-
comment
Comment #34520518
He's also been exposed as having sent sexually explicit DMs to minors, which started to come to light after the lawsuit was filed. It was probably that, more than/in addition to th…
-
comment
Comment #34332849
Your statement upthread, which I replied to: > Most poor people are children under 18. I guess technically, you can work at 16, so some of them probably dropped out and work full-t…
-
comment
Comment #34327737
Hi! I worked for a nonprofit poverty advocacy center in Chicago. This is totally wrong, but it's stated so confidently. Why do you say this? What's the source you got this opinion …
-
comment
Comment #34317901
How does this work in practice, though? I don't know how this would be possible at all. I have loaned money to family members in the past, and been paid back when they were back on…
-
comment
Comment #34142391
[flagged]