Viewing profile — bugfix-66
bugfix-66
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Sep 24, 2022, 3:36 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 501
- Public activity
- 264 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About bugfix-66
Recent public activity
- comment
-
comment
Comment #33854637
No, I mean https://www.amazon.com/Art-Computer-Programming-Combinatoria...
-
comment
Comment #33850890
You don't test on the training set. Everybody in ML (e.g., me) knows that. But that's what we're seeing. I'm saying: "Here's a test outside the training set."
-
comment
Comment #33850856
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #33850833
That's right. There was no snark intended.
-
comment
Comment #33849901
I seriously doubt this appeals to the modern Hacker News crowd, but it might appeal to a couple of you: Published in October 2022, The Art of Computer Programming: Volume 4B is daz…
-
comment
Comment #33845520
The training set is full of code for these problems. Put your query into Google and see how many thousands of answers appear. Your tests are in the training set.
-
comment
Comment #33845472
Look at how many times that program appears when you paste your question into Google. The language model was trained on it.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #33845034
Named after the two companies that promoted it.
- story
-
comment
Comment #33834710
It was trained on numerous Leetcode solutions (question/answer), which you can find on GitHub. People are proud of their Leetcode efforts: they post their solutions, as if it is an…
-
comment
Comment #33827206
Radix sort is also very simple, e.g., https://bugfix-66.com/834f0677c85b23c0bf1047d3654ab7c27ff054... And djb's vectorized sorting networks are pretty great: https://sorting.cr.yp.…
-
comment
Comment #33826171
Now do it for an algorithm+explanation the training set doesn't contain a million copies of, please. For example, substitute "The Burrows-Wheeler Inverse Transform" for "bubble sor…
-
comment
Comment #33822363
Look at Section 8 and Section 9 here: http://tug.ctan.org/info/tex-nutshell/tex-nutshell.pdf How is ChatGPT's answer wrong? The regex is matching square brackets instead of the cor…
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #33812315
A different kind of programming puzzle: https://BUGFIX-66.com The idea is that you read and understand a small piece of code (full of useful techniques) and make a small change to …
-
comment
Comment #33806994
Similarly, you can turn off bounds-checking in Go like this: go build -gcflags=-B and see if it helps. Generally the assembly looks better, but it doesn't really run faster on a mo…
-
comment
Comment #33769491
43 days ago I asked this question: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33215740 This question got voted down everywhere I discussed it on Hacker News, but somehow the submission i…
-
comment
Comment #33768701
It's just a fixed point instruction. Fixed point multiply: a*m times b*m yields (a*b)*m = a*m * b*m / m In the above, m is the fixed point 1. For example, 65536 for a 16.16 fixed p…
-
comment
Comment #33767392
Look at the Green Arrays F18, the "conclusion" that Forth reached: https://www.greenarraychips.com/home/documents/greg/PB003-11... Here's a clear description of what each instructi…
- story
-
comment
Comment #33764863
This is based on Russ Cox's essay: https://research.swtch.com/gorace The code in Russ Cox's article does not race with the modern Go compiler. But it's simple to fix that. Given ar…
- story