Viewing profile — bufbuild
bufbuild
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Oct 16, 2019, 4:20 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 43
- Public activity
- 19 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About bufbuild
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48893960
> No clear and easy way to use it with HTTP/1.1. Neither is specific to Python. > It seems like Google focused on gRPC, but the real prize for adoption would've been going after th…
- story
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #41683465
Connect libraries are 100% compatible with gRPC - in many cases, they implement the gRPC spec more faithfully than the core libraries themselves: https://buf.build/blog/grpc-confor…
-
comment
Comment #33409807
It's worth checking out our take on a lot of these problems: https://buf.build/blog/connect-web-protobuf-grpc-in-the-brow...
-
comment
Comment #33406279
protobuf-es does as well! https://github.com/bufbuild/connect-web
-
comment
Comment #32816905
That is for the text format, which is a serialized representation of Protobuf data. As they specify in the linked doc, it is not the format for the actual language: > This format i…
-
comment
Comment #32351351
Of course, also check out Connect :-) https://connect.build
-
comment
Comment #32351320
The URI is per-RPC, specifically at /service/method, if that helps. On cacheability, do check out https://connect.build/docs/protocol#future-extensions - it’s something we continue…
-
comment
Comment #32351279
And there’s Buf Studio :-) https://buf.build/blog/buf-studio https://studio.buf.build
-
comment
Comment #32351018
We’d really recommend checking out the Connect protocol in this case - we totally understand that a new custom protocol would induce a few eye rolls, but it’s about as simple as it…
-
comment
Comment #32350835
It already does! The connect protocol supports all streaming mechanisms. The beauty of the Connect ecosystem is that no proxies are required - the Connect protocol works just as we…
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story