Viewing profile — btmspox
btmspox
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jan 29, 2009, 12:41 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 5
- Public activity
- 9 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About btmspox
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #19554947
Chef Automate was not previously open source but will be.
-
comment
Comment #5208275
Always appreciate bugs being filed. I did a little pondering on the ticket the other day. Since we're using update-rc.d, we're likely talking about debian package install, which me…
-
comment
Comment #5201839
A large part of that was an unfortunate side-affect of gecode (a library Chef used for dependency resolution in Chef 10) not having a -nox package, thus pulling in libqt4-dev, whic…
-
comment
Comment #5201771
Do it early, for many reasons. I worked as a systems administrator for startups before we wrote Chef, and I wouldn't go back to managing infrastructure by hand. A few reasons: * Yo…
-
comment
Comment #5201711
I'm sorry you feel that you didn't have a good experience. As one of the original Chef contributors before Opscode, and then becoming one of the lead people working with the open s…
-
comment
Comment #3740970
It was a comical github issue related to @shanley basically accusing @csanz and @rekatz of @gklst of sexism. Someone has put a screenshot of the github issue here: http://imgur.com…
-
comment
Comment #3563165
The importance of the Chef DSL is abstracting away common system interactions and most importantly, all the edge cases that come up. Whatever you are automating, you're going to be…
-
comment
Comment #3559579
If package management was as a happily solved of a problem as you imply, I think we would see fewer solutions out there. Each tends to solve for the needs of its own environment, u…
-
comment
Comment #3559063
Opinions of Rubygems differ greatly and I would consider cargo culting gems as a distribution and dependency management infrastructure for Chef cookbooks to only be great for those…