Viewing profile — bsummer4
bsummer4
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jul 02, 2014, 4:55 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 55
- Public activity
- 42 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About bsummer4
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #17142374
But flexibility is the problem with XMPP in the first place. None of the clients and servers have compatible feature sets.
-
comment
Comment #16610689
So? The problem is our school systems and or work environments, not our biology. We are a VERY significant minority of the population, and our institutions are not working for us. …
-
comment
Comment #16610662
I've argued with a lot of friends about the "buy it for life" meme. I think it overlooks how quickly people change what they want from their things. Maybe a more healthy meme could…
-
comment
Comment #16508647
People need to stop using the word "hate" and start calling people out whenever they use it. "Hate" just means "blasphemy". Once you make this substitution, discussions like this s…
-
comment
Comment #16508641
I think it isn't. I think it's dead on. I think it's just conflicting with your religious beliefs, so you automatically interpret it as "simplistic" and "mischaracterizing" to avoi…
-
comment
Comment #16351020
If you upgrade stack and then do stack build , it's very close to being guaranteed to work. Stack (and stackage) is the best nicest, most-reliable build-system of any language.
-
comment
Comment #16351014
One has to learn how to deal with cabal anyway Nah, I haven't used cabal-install in years now. Because of hpack , you don't even need to write .cabal files. The only time I touch c…
-
comment
Comment #12102027
Do be fair, he said "impure language" and not "impure code". "Looks like we need to let the scholars know - there are 18,300 uses of the non-word "performant" in scholarly papers" …
-
comment
Comment #11455983
It's not! classy-prelude is compatible with existing abstractions and doesn't try to replace large portions of the basic types and classes.
-
comment
Comment #10431148
I think the similarities are mostly superficial. I mean it has (local) type inference, ADTs, and traits (which are sooooorta like type classes). But, as a Haskell programmer, the R…
-
comment
Comment #10420488
It really doesn't have that much in common with Haskell either. It's designed by people who are not oblivious about PL stuff, but it's still pretty thoroughly in the C/C++ world in…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #10209799
Yeah, this is a good point. Both math and music have extremely ad-hoc and inconsistent syntax.
-
comment
Comment #10209591
The article spends a lot of time talking about how "Complicated" abstractions are, and about how abstractions come with a complexity cost. IMHO, the opposite is true. > Whenever I …
-
comment
Comment #10147246
Yep. This is the same bullshit that some companies with open-source products try to shove down your throat.
-
comment
Comment #10114760
Racket is pretty cool! Sincerely, a Haskell developer.
-
comment
Comment #10087496
Sure, but in this case "knowing the rules" is equivalent to being fluent in a language, not some document that you can read.
-
comment
Comment #9910044
Haskell is all of these things, though it's library ecosystem has a pretty lengthy learning curve.
-
comment
Comment #9669178
1.4 tastes terrible. I've been using it, but I've developed a very specific ritual for making it palatable, and it's still not an enjoyable experience. If 1.5 is anywhere near as t…
-
comment
Comment #9663446
Any idea when GHC 7.10's static pointers will be supported?
-
comment
Comment #9541015
Are you sure you're not still waking up in the middle of the cycle? 90 minutes is just a loose generalization. Different people have different sleep cycles and take different amoun…
-
comment
Comment #9443914
Yi is really nice, overall. The code is clean too. I don't remember all of the issues, but there are a ton of small things that make the editor unusable to me. I used it for a coup…
-
comment
Comment #9442745
Not really, no. yi badly needs some more love.
-
comment
Comment #9442734
You can't write this in Haskell: print(arr[i]) You can write this, but you probably wouldn't. print (arr `V.unsafeIndex` i)
-
comment
Comment #9436313
Thank you! This is a really good comment. Also, your bug reports are really solid.