Viewing profile — brunomlopes
brunomlopes
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Aug 10, 2009, 5:45 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 24
- Public activity
- 20 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About brunomlopes
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #36958720
For me, it's the portability/size. I don't have a benchtop I can use just for soldering, so my soldering toolkit lives in a box with all it needs. When I wanna do some work, I pick…
-
comment
Comment #7122900
On windows it's the same. Although I think I usually install ipython outside of virtualenvs, because I tend to always use it.
-
comment
Comment #5625143
I'd like to propose another use case: HUDs. I've recently took up cycling to work and back, and would love to have speed/gears/time up on the glasses, instead of having to look and…
-
comment
Comment #4498089
I actually solved the "get the data out from the homebanking system" via 100 lines of javascript executed in phantomjs to screenscrape the site. It isn't pretty, it might break, an…
-
comment
Comment #4267025
Just to give my 2c, EF is not so much an alternative to Dapper/Massive/PetaPoco as an alternative to NHibernate. Both are "heavy-duty" orms, while those 3 are more lightweight. My …
-
comment
Comment #3627317
Mine doesn't crash on Web projects, but can't work for a couple of hours on a Windows Phone 7 project without it going boom . I think most of it works fine and dandy, but some part…
-
comment
Comment #3101116
If you end up trying to setup git on a linux machine, two things: - setup or have available another linux machine to act as a "client". git on windows with ssh can be a bit fidgety…
-
comment
Comment #2945540
I used to struggle with it too, until some time ago I think it all kind of clicked in place. Don't try and think of it as similar to other shells like bash, but as an interactive c…
-
comment
Comment #2511077
Actually, if you look at other posts from Sam mentioning dapper you'll find that they profiled the site and found some bottlenecks also on the translator from the datareader to obj…
-
comment
Comment #2466186
I think you're on to something with "only one member is virtual" and previous experience. Communication is essencial and harder to manage if just one member is virtual. So, it may …
-
comment
Comment #1911113
Interesting, and it makes a bit of sense, even if it is counterintuitive. "It creates a single file system that spans the internal storage and the SD card." - Meaning that you don'…
-
comment
Comment #1889796
Meh, ClassMaps for 90% of the stuff are all the same, so I love the automap ideia mostly to spare me the bother :)
-
comment
Comment #1889793
Actually, if your model has ProductID and NewPrice you can create just the Update controler/view for that. Put some validation on the model, and the scaffolding is done. Or you cou…
-
comment
Comment #1888475
As for point 2., I think you can generate the UI from any model class, right? So you can create a model for each task and generate the scaffolding for that particular model.
-
comment
Comment #1888469
Just to offer a different road, you could do something like that with the previous version of MVC + Fluent NHibernate with automapping and schema_update, if I'm not mistaken :)
-
comment
Comment #1888456
I think you make a great point there about the teacher already knowing VB.NET and not knowing Python. It may be the difference between being able to teach the concepts well and sho…
-
comment
Comment #1888433
I think there are a couple of idioms which are a bit more concise in ruby ( unless , or some of the stuff with blocks), but it's a matter of personal taste, I think. I do agree on …
-
comment
Comment #1885819
I'd argue that Ruby is a bit harder to learn, specially for someone with no background in programming. While Python tends towards clarity and predictability, Ruby tends more toward…
-
comment
Comment #1852358
I've been using Git Extensions and it works great: http://code.google.com/p/gitextensions/ I find that the workflow using this tool fits me better than with tortoise, mostly becaus…
-
comment
Comment #753530
Not only does that require reflection, it is very error prone and not refactor-friendly. Just change the type of the list, change the method, and it will blow up on runtime instead…