Viewing profile — bribriinlondon2

No, re-read the article, your wrong. We made our system's data unreadable by staff, that's the first thing we did. Making it readable by GCHQ would have incurred the cost.

That's a complete misunderstanding of the law and on whose shoulders it falls on to provide data in the clear to the relevant authorities upon legal request.

Again, that's the silver lining in this story. For details on how trust is split to assure no single point of failure, have a look at https://certivox.org/pages/viewpage.action?pag…

This is Brian, the CEO. Yea, it was a nice round number out of the air. But it probably wasn't far off the mark. For all the other comments, below is a blog post on the matter whic…

That is very cool. I agree though, the description could be a little misleading, as there is the requirement for the centralised sever.

Dick

Nice work!

Security?