Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — breuleux

breuleux

HN member
Joined
Sun, Jul 14, 2013, 8:50 PM UTC
HN karma
1,668
Public activity
539 items

About breuleux

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49203421

    If you’re only running models for frontier capabilities, yeah. For tasks where current models are smart enough, running them 100x faster is the most impactful improvement you can m…

  2. comment
    Comment #49187911

    If the ASIC runs a model 100x better (faster, cheaper, less energy, etc.), it will remain competitive on any task for which frontier models don't improve as quickly. Any task for w…

  3. comment
    Comment #49187063

    > Good governance takes intelligence. True, but that doesn't mean intelligence is the bottleneck of good governance. Good governance also requires simple, plain brute force. You ha…

  4. comment
    Comment #49118421

    That is true, but that suggests that the value of software is reverting to the value of a jig. Software that gets deployed to millions of people gets a large valuation because it p…

  5. comment
    Comment #49079218

    There is no "evidence" that anything has consciousness, nor could there be. To clarify, by that I don't mean nothing is conscious, I mean that it's never been an evidence-based pro…

  6. comment
    Comment #49071472

    Why, exactly, is this distinction relevant? The brain must store episodic memory somewhere too. From a cursory read, it seems to me that our experiences are processed through the h…

  7. comment
    Comment #49069901

    > We have absolutely no idea what consciousness is We do, in the sense that it is a definite feeling. What we don't have is a formal, objective, checkable definition of it. I suspe…

  8. comment
    Comment #49028254

    Is it? Genuine question. Say you didn't do these things at all -- what would that change to your life? Are you gaining productivity in high-impact things, or stuff that might scrat…

  9. comment
    Comment #48997581

    The phrase was in an episode of The Office prior to that. I think it's fairly old.

  10. comment
    Comment #48997455

    Yeah... savage capitalism will ruin this too :'(

  11. comment
    Comment #48986539

    > even though I have faster models available I still go to Fable or GPT-5.6 90% of the time What about all the things you don't currently use an LLM for? If a specialized chip can …

  12. comment
    Comment #48969353

    Part of the issue with "shipping" AI-generated code is, what's the value of shipping something that your prospective customers could just make for themselves? Shipping a product us…

  13. comment
    Comment #48915834

    Maybe, maybe not. The point is that you can't simply will energy into existence. Its availability, including the ease of exploitation, is a physical given. Which is true of resourc…

  14. comment
    Comment #48913172

    > I'm assuming also, anything like a paper with data, can also be questioned in the same way. Don't object, I've seen that done. Unless you've seen me do it, I don't see why I can'…

  15. comment
    Comment #48910270

    > I didn't mean to include science fiction authors, or extreme futurists. Science fiction authors are quite influential, and I don't think they were the only ones either. I expect …

  16. comment
    Comment #48906871

    > We have advanced tremendously over the past 200 years Would most of that have happened if we hadn't found oil, though? It's difficult to precisely identify how much of progress i…

  17. comment
    Comment #48906477

    > Literally, things everyone said would take 30 or 100 years, happen within months. "Everyone"? Plenty of people in the 50s said we'd have sentient humanoid robots before the year …

  18. comment
    Comment #48902115

    I mean, unironically, yeah. If you want flavor, just mix jam in your plain yogurt.

  19. comment
    Comment #48810042

    I just see it as a way to highlight the absurdity. They're heavily implying they won't buy books on Amazon anymore in the next paragraph: > So it looks as though this move — both m…

  20. comment
    Comment #48809838

    I don't think there's good evidence that it directly jumps to truth. The aim of betting on a prediction market is to earn money. This incentivizes you to bet on whatever you believ…

  21. comment
    Comment #48766766

    > unless you control the stack down to the hardware, it's basically a one way ticket to eternal slavery Only if mind uploads are economically viable, which I doubt they ever will b…

  22. comment
    Comment #48389505

    > Our biology is ridiculously optimized. Like 6-7 orders of magnitude more energy efficient than current day AI/computation stack. It's plausible that AI can never outperform us at…

  23. comment
    Comment #48376268

    I suppose. I think it depends on your tooling somewhat. I mean, looking at the feature article, Bonsai lets you define TUI elements with an HTML-inspired syntax -- so if you're usi…

  24. comment
    Comment #48369585

    > and then there's just TUIs, which look retrocool and run blazing fast, and are really easy to write I mean, I don't even think that's true. Many TUIs are bloated, dogshit slow, a…

  25. comment
    Comment #48360777

    The point is more that you can well imagine a future where AI is both better and cheaper than humans at basically all types of work, leading to a situation where we would be entire…