Viewing profile — breuleux
breuleux
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Jul 14, 2013, 8:50 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,668
- Public activity
- 539 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About breuleux
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49203421
If you’re only running models for frontier capabilities, yeah. For tasks where current models are smart enough, running them 100x faster is the most impactful improvement you can m…
-
comment
Comment #49187911
If the ASIC runs a model 100x better (faster, cheaper, less energy, etc.), it will remain competitive on any task for which frontier models don't improve as quickly. Any task for w…
-
comment
Comment #49187063
> Good governance takes intelligence. True, but that doesn't mean intelligence is the bottleneck of good governance. Good governance also requires simple, plain brute force. You ha…
-
comment
Comment #49118421
That is true, but that suggests that the value of software is reverting to the value of a jig. Software that gets deployed to millions of people gets a large valuation because it p…
-
comment
Comment #49079218
There is no "evidence" that anything has consciousness, nor could there be. To clarify, by that I don't mean nothing is conscious, I mean that it's never been an evidence-based pro…
-
comment
Comment #49071472
Why, exactly, is this distinction relevant? The brain must store episodic memory somewhere too. From a cursory read, it seems to me that our experiences are processed through the h…
-
comment
Comment #49069901
> We have absolutely no idea what consciousness is We do, in the sense that it is a definite feeling. What we don't have is a formal, objective, checkable definition of it. I suspe…
-
comment
Comment #49028254
Is it? Genuine question. Say you didn't do these things at all -- what would that change to your life? Are you gaining productivity in high-impact things, or stuff that might scrat…
-
comment
Comment #48997581
The phrase was in an episode of The Office prior to that. I think it's fairly old.
-
comment
Comment #48997455
Yeah... savage capitalism will ruin this too :'(
-
comment
Comment #48986539
> even though I have faster models available I still go to Fable or GPT-5.6 90% of the time What about all the things you don't currently use an LLM for? If a specialized chip can …
-
comment
Comment #48969353
Part of the issue with "shipping" AI-generated code is, what's the value of shipping something that your prospective customers could just make for themselves? Shipping a product us…
-
comment
Comment #48915834
Maybe, maybe not. The point is that you can't simply will energy into existence. Its availability, including the ease of exploitation, is a physical given. Which is true of resourc…
-
comment
Comment #48913172
> I'm assuming also, anything like a paper with data, can also be questioned in the same way. Don't object, I've seen that done. Unless you've seen me do it, I don't see why I can'…
-
comment
Comment #48910270
> I didn't mean to include science fiction authors, or extreme futurists. Science fiction authors are quite influential, and I don't think they were the only ones either. I expect …
-
comment
Comment #48906871
> We have advanced tremendously over the past 200 years Would most of that have happened if we hadn't found oil, though? It's difficult to precisely identify how much of progress i…
-
comment
Comment #48906477
> Literally, things everyone said would take 30 or 100 years, happen within months. "Everyone"? Plenty of people in the 50s said we'd have sentient humanoid robots before the year …
-
comment
Comment #48902115
I mean, unironically, yeah. If you want flavor, just mix jam in your plain yogurt.
-
comment
Comment #48810042
I just see it as a way to highlight the absurdity. They're heavily implying they won't buy books on Amazon anymore in the next paragraph: > So it looks as though this move — both m…
-
comment
Comment #48809838
I don't think there's good evidence that it directly jumps to truth. The aim of betting on a prediction market is to earn money. This incentivizes you to bet on whatever you believ…
-
comment
Comment #48766766
> unless you control the stack down to the hardware, it's basically a one way ticket to eternal slavery Only if mind uploads are economically viable, which I doubt they ever will b…
-
comment
Comment #48389505
> Our biology is ridiculously optimized. Like 6-7 orders of magnitude more energy efficient than current day AI/computation stack. It's plausible that AI can never outperform us at…
-
comment
Comment #48376268
I suppose. I think it depends on your tooling somewhat. I mean, looking at the feature article, Bonsai lets you define TUI elements with an HTML-inspired syntax -- so if you're usi…
-
comment
Comment #48369585
> and then there's just TUIs, which look retrocool and run blazing fast, and are really easy to write I mean, I don't even think that's true. Many TUIs are bloated, dogshit slow, a…
-
comment
Comment #48360777
The point is more that you can well imagine a future where AI is both better and cheaper than humans at basically all types of work, leading to a situation where we would be entire…