Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — branchan

branchan

HN member
Joined
Wed, Apr 25, 2012, 8:57 PM UTC
HN karma
170
Public activity
156 items

About branchan

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #21838642

    That's what the 'Quiet' part of the name is trying to solve. From another source: The X-59 has been designed to achieve a PLdB of 75, similar to what might be heard when standing n…

  2. comment
    Comment #21508329

    Not mentioned in the article is that NASA has also been experimenting with the viability of using Nvidia GPUs for space-based applications: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=…

  3. comment
    Comment #21507911

    Not anymore. Especially not if you google "RHEL laser".

  4. comment
    Comment #21507806

    That is definitely not how China would enforce it. You need a Starlink terminal in order to communicate with the satellite. China will most likely just block the sales of Starlink …

  5. comment
    Comment #21507748

    Your statistic in no way diminishes the losses that each country suffered during the war.

  6. comment
    Comment #21485469

    I find it hard to believe that they are completely re-designing the avionics/flight computers because of this gamma ray incident. There must be another reason. If it's seriously th…

  7. comment
    Comment #21485133

    There's also currently a push by many countries to have carbon monitoring satellites above their countries. For example: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/meet-the-satelli…

  8. comment
    Comment #21457481

    Do you use the internet? GPS? Where do you think those technologies come from?

  9. comment
    Comment #21424020

    It’s likely that your work and life has greatly benefited from technologies that originated from the military.

  10. comment
    Comment #21411778

    I think we have been desensitized by all these SpaceX rocket landings. Propulsive landing is not as easy as it seems.

  11. comment
    Comment #21411764

    Imagine you are SpaceX. You are going to be launching a Starship. Given how booked your launch manifest is, would you rather launch a cubesat or a full-sized payload? Which would e…

  12. comment
    Comment #21401929

    1. It's not always feasible to launch your spacecraft with Starship (e.g. it wouldn't make sense if you are just launching a cubesat). 2. That's a pretty aggressive timeline to hav…

  13. comment
    Comment #21401905

    Oh yea? https://www.newscientist.com/article/2215303-spacex-satellit...

  14. comment
    Comment #21401887

    Starship still needs to fire rockets in order to land. I would say it's a crazier idea than the ones you have mentioned. The previous solutions you have listed were used precisely …

  15. comment
    Comment #21401790

    You can be sneaky sure, but that what background checks are for - to see if you are a trustworthy individual.

  16. comment
    Comment #21401623

    I mean, the whole statement is not correct. Sure JPL manufactured some things but it also acts just like NASA, managing the Mars projects. Most of the spacecraft I would say were m…

  17. comment
    Comment #21337437

    An electronic watch is ok. Just not with cellular, wireless or bluetooth, USB capabilities.

  18. comment
    Comment #20882445

    Every manufacturer needs a good revenue source. Unless you are a manufacturer that is making mass market cars like Honda and Toyota, you need to create cars that people will buy if…

  19. comment
    Comment #20765789

    So is your idea to have spacecraft go to LEO first instead of direct GTO? Is this an efficient use of fuel?

  20. comment
    Comment #20765722

    Who is "we"? Care to identify yourself? What existing interface are you talking about? Which GEO manufacturer is making 5000 lb spacecraft?

  21. comment
    Comment #20750654

    I didn't research every spacecraft but if you look at GTOSat, its intended orbit is GTO, so it won't really need the services of Epic since a rocket can place them there directly. …

  22. comment
    Comment #20749150

    Is this even true? https://gomspace.com/shop/subsystems/attitude-orbit-control-... https://www.cubesatshop.com/product/ifm-nano-thruster/ https://www.vacco.com/space/chems-overview…

  23. comment
    Comment #20749073

    I totally agree. You still need to get the fuel to space regardless of who is doing the propulsion work. Let's say that your tug is already on-orbit, how is the fuel going to be br…

  24. comment
    Comment #20700509

    They also mentioned that they can afford to have satellites fail since they are cheaper and sending up so many. Also won't be possible with one-off GEO birds.

  25. comment
    Comment #20699340

    I think this is only true for small LEO spacecrafts that are more or less 'disposable'. For higher cost GEO and interplanetary spacecraft, consumer electronics are not going to be …