Viewing profile — branchan
branchan
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Apr 25, 2012, 8:57 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 170
- Public activity
- 156 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About branchan
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #21838642
That's what the 'Quiet' part of the name is trying to solve. From another source: The X-59 has been designed to achieve a PLdB of 75, similar to what might be heard when standing n…
-
comment
Comment #21508329
Not mentioned in the article is that NASA has also been experimenting with the viability of using Nvidia GPUs for space-based applications: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=…
-
comment
Comment #21507911
Not anymore. Especially not if you google "RHEL laser".
-
comment
Comment #21507806
That is definitely not how China would enforce it. You need a Starlink terminal in order to communicate with the satellite. China will most likely just block the sales of Starlink …
-
comment
Comment #21507748
Your statistic in no way diminishes the losses that each country suffered during the war.
-
comment
Comment #21485469
I find it hard to believe that they are completely re-designing the avionics/flight computers because of this gamma ray incident. There must be another reason. If it's seriously th…
-
comment
Comment #21485133
There's also currently a push by many countries to have carbon monitoring satellites above their countries. For example: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/meet-the-satelli…
-
comment
Comment #21457481
Do you use the internet? GPS? Where do you think those technologies come from?
-
comment
Comment #21424020
It’s likely that your work and life has greatly benefited from technologies that originated from the military.
-
comment
Comment #21411778
I think we have been desensitized by all these SpaceX rocket landings. Propulsive landing is not as easy as it seems.
-
comment
Comment #21411764
Imagine you are SpaceX. You are going to be launching a Starship. Given how booked your launch manifest is, would you rather launch a cubesat or a full-sized payload? Which would e…
-
comment
Comment #21401929
1. It's not always feasible to launch your spacecraft with Starship (e.g. it wouldn't make sense if you are just launching a cubesat). 2. That's a pretty aggressive timeline to hav…
-
comment
Comment #21401905
Oh yea? https://www.newscientist.com/article/2215303-spacex-satellit...
-
comment
Comment #21401887
Starship still needs to fire rockets in order to land. I would say it's a crazier idea than the ones you have mentioned. The previous solutions you have listed were used precisely …
-
comment
Comment #21401790
You can be sneaky sure, but that what background checks are for - to see if you are a trustworthy individual.
-
comment
Comment #21401623
I mean, the whole statement is not correct. Sure JPL manufactured some things but it also acts just like NASA, managing the Mars projects. Most of the spacecraft I would say were m…
-
comment
Comment #21337437
An electronic watch is ok. Just not with cellular, wireless or bluetooth, USB capabilities.
-
comment
Comment #20882445
Every manufacturer needs a good revenue source. Unless you are a manufacturer that is making mass market cars like Honda and Toyota, you need to create cars that people will buy if…
-
comment
Comment #20765789
So is your idea to have spacecraft go to LEO first instead of direct GTO? Is this an efficient use of fuel?
-
comment
Comment #20765722
Who is "we"? Care to identify yourself? What existing interface are you talking about? Which GEO manufacturer is making 5000 lb spacecraft?
-
comment
Comment #20750654
I didn't research every spacecraft but if you look at GTOSat, its intended orbit is GTO, so it won't really need the services of Epic since a rocket can place them there directly. …
-
comment
Comment #20749150
Is this even true? https://gomspace.com/shop/subsystems/attitude-orbit-control-... https://www.cubesatshop.com/product/ifm-nano-thruster/ https://www.vacco.com/space/chems-overview…
-
comment
Comment #20749073
I totally agree. You still need to get the fuel to space regardless of who is doing the propulsion work. Let's say that your tug is already on-orbit, how is the fuel going to be br…
-
comment
Comment #20700509
They also mentioned that they can afford to have satellites fail since they are cheaper and sending up so many. Also won't be possible with one-off GEO birds.
-
comment
Comment #20699340
I think this is only true for small LEO spacecrafts that are more or less 'disposable'. For higher cost GEO and interplanetary spacecraft, consumer electronics are not going to be …