Viewing profile — bostonpete
bostonpete
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Feb 11, 2011, 3:37 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 2,331
- Public activity
- 874 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About bostonpete
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #45442868
Not sure “thankless” really applies here. She enjoyed a sort of celebrity status for the past 40-50 years and was universally loved.
-
comment
Comment #43136020
Ball spin would be trivial to simulate. The only way I could see the physics getting at all expensive is if they went overboard with fluid dynamics
-
comment
Comment #40526978
What is the significance of the article/post title...?
-
comment
Comment #40162937
AWS has a denied party screening team and absolutely restricts access to services based on the BIS entity list and other sanctioned parties.
-
comment
Comment #40025072
I believe Musk was wealthy basically from birth…
-
comment
Comment #39920093
Whether MS deserves credit or not, he's a very senior SW engineer at Microsoft so this should at least provide some reassurance that the company has technical leaders who are looki…
-
comment
Comment #39180033
> TIL that car fatalities were declining until 2019, and then reversed and are getting worse. Per your link, fatalities per mile drive bottomed out in 2014 and barely dropped after…
-
comment
Comment #38984573
How so? The submission you linked is a different article?
-
comment
Comment #38561498
Speech to text is often wrong too. So is autocorrect. And object detection. Computers don't have to be 100% correct in order to be useful, as long as we don't put too much faith in…
-
comment
Comment #38041946
This seems like a non sequitur -- the parent was just pointing out that the article's use of "browser" was probably a typo. In addition to being more correct using "search engine" …
-
comment
Comment #37945332
That seems like a leap -- there's other foods that can provide sufficient iodine (e.g. fish, eggs, milk)...
-
comment
Comment #36880011
You didn't really make a comment -- you just dropped in an Asimov quote. And xNeil's interpretation of the relevance of that comment matched my intuition. If you had some other int…
-
comment
Comment #36853318
The USG isn't setting out to make money on major ventures. Publicly traded companies are.
-
comment
Comment #35239354
Can you share the palindrome?
-
comment
Comment #32976958
A Google search suggests that person may have been talking about the Black Dahlia killer, not the Zodiac killer
-
comment
Comment #32544377
Would be nice if they linked the study or at least an article about it.
-
comment
Comment #32325209
Wow, TIL you can use sed syntax in vi. I'm not a heavy vi user but that's still a handy trick. :-)
-
comment
Comment #32325172
That's not really true, at least not in the same way being discussed above. Jobs already owned millions of shares in Apple stock, so yes, he profited from the stock but AFAIK that …
-
comment
Comment #32192732
10-15% of car accidents are cause by mechanical failure. Some of those could certainly be blamed on large corporations cutting corners, so my question still stands.
-
comment
Comment #32184429
Makes sense, but that still doesn't explain why we ignore tens of thousands of auto deaths per year but talk about one Uber ATG death for 5 years...
-
comment
Comment #31532832
Absolutely someone would buy a house with blemishes like that! Most house buyers look past that stuff, especially when the housing market is hot (which it still is). Get your house…
-
comment
Comment #30166475
Perceptive Automata ( https://www.perceptiveautomata.com/ ) | Boston, MA | Fulltime, open to REMOTE candidates Fulltime | VISA sponsorship available Perceptive Automata is a Boston…
-
comment
Comment #29876809
I'm inclined to agree as I'm extremely skeptical of NFT's but I'd note that your "stone" thought exercise could also be applied to things like trading cards or other collectibles, …
-
comment
Comment #29640518
I usually look to r/science for this sort of skepticism. This particular thread doesn't seem especially negative... https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/ren6cc/japanese_sc...
-
comment
Comment #29503724
The second sentence explicitly tells you what the graph is showing. The first sentence doesn't contradict that, it just seems to provide some context. (?)