Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — boolemancer

boolemancer

HN member
Joined
Tue, Feb 26, 2019, 9:59 AM UTC
HN karma
304
Public activity
88 items

About boolemancer

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #43131291

    There's already a rate limit on pulls. All this does is make that rate limit more inconvenient by making it hourly instead of allowing you to amortize it over 6 hours. 10 per hour …

  2. comment
    Comment #42382158

    > The average user doesn't even recognize that running a website literally cost electricity that must be paid for. Who pays for it? Who will carry the boats? Running a retail store…

  3. comment
    Comment #42111934

    It's not a limitation of the internet, it's a fundamental property of communication. Imagine trying to validate that all letters sent to your company are written by special company…

  4. comment
    Comment #42110686

    If an endpoint costs a lot to run, implement rate limits and return 429 status codes so callers know that they're calling too often. That endpoint will be expensive regardless of w…

  5. comment
    Comment #42109797

    In my personal view, this seems a little overbearing. If you expose an API, and you want to tell a user that they are "unauthorized" to use it, it should return a 401 status code s…

  6. comment
    Comment #41892841

    > Single English words cannot be trademarked. Um... Apple? Shell? Alphabet? Chevron? Target? Caterpillar? Oracle? Orange?

  7. comment
    Comment #41825043

    If all that's missing is 'a nasm compatible assembler', did they try just swapping it out for nasm, which seems to have a readily available alpine package? https://pkgs.alpinelinux…

  8. comment
    Comment #41714405

    > and game dumping. Your argument is that legally purchasing a game and playing that in an emulator is piracy?

  9. comment
    Comment #41661592

    > Because it often isn't. I don't know about your experience, but in all the teams I've worked in throughout my career the discipline to keep PRs atomic is almost never maintained,…

  10. comment
    Comment #41654227

    > At the risk of sounding judgemental, I think this preference for always squashing PRs comes from a place of either not understanding atomic commits, not caring about the benefits…

  11. comment
    Comment #41007635

    Yeah, because no one on Linux or Mac would clone a git repo they just found out about and blindly run the setup scripts listed in the readme. And no one would pipe a script downloa…

  12. comment
    Comment #40703259

    Is this the first Summoning Salt video you've seen? I don't know enough to say that he doesn't use an LLM during his writing process, but I do know that I haven't noticed any appre…

  13. comment
    Comment #40690135

    Maybe that's a harsh lesson in making promises that can't be delivered? Or, more likely, no lessons will be learned and people will still trust what the company says in the future …

  14. comment
    Comment #40689702

    Seems like the best way for somebody to get over a bad thing that they did in their past is to be forthright in acknowledging that they did the bad thing, and show through their ac…

  15. comment
    Comment #40660258

    > It also allows for much easier reverting of specific changes in case some part of a topic needs removed. I guess I struggle to see where reverting entire commits makes more sense…

  16. comment
    Comment #40659256

    That seems like significantly more work for marginal (if any) benefit over just having a single squash commit per PR. I don't think I've ever found myself in a situation where I ne…

  17. comment
    Comment #40359113

    > When reviewers look for these logic issues, they often run through the code line-by-line using different inputs and see if any lines cause the code to produce the wrong output. I…

  18. comment
    Comment #40299105

    When you are charging people extra for the features you're promising will exist in the future, it seems reasonable to call that fraud if you never deliver.

  19. comment
    Comment #40238300

    > _and_ charging for early access to an update to make it playable with Yuzu. From my understanding, this part is not true (though it is widely touted). There were third parties th…

  20. comment
    Comment #40219690

    I think what they're getting at is that for something low quality is less likely to have survived for a hundred years to even be a contender in this race.

  21. comment
    Comment #40184318

    > Withholding too much is literally required under the law. If you don't withhold enough, at tax time you could be liable for penalties unless you also pay quarterly to make up the…

  22. comment
    Comment #39977835

    > Personally, I think these companies are just stealing copyrighted works, and should be sued for that. It's against the law, it's pretty simple. Is it copyright infringement to co…

  23. comment
    Comment #39886098

    I assume that an "ATR turboprop" does not count as a commercial jet.

  24. comment
    Comment #39757525

    How on earth is it Canon's fault when Apple releases a breaking change?

  25. comment
    Comment #39717608

    I would imagine you would call yourself a Software Engineer if what you do for a living is software engineering. I'm not sure that schooling needs to be a factor.