Viewing profile — bogositosius
bogositosius
HN member- Joined
- Tue, May 02, 2017, 6:55 AM UTC
- HN karma
- -1
- Public activity
- 45 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About bogositosius
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #14493304
>when adjusted for population Have you adjusted for crime rates?
-
comment
Comment #14364571
Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra!
-
comment
Comment #14320845
>If there is a place where government regulation can do some good, this might be it. Isn't government regulation the cause of this problem? These trolls only exist because there's …
-
comment
Comment #14320618
>Make no mistake, Cloudflare is a strong supporter of the patent system. Well this is pretty rich.
-
comment
Comment #14271874
Do you work for a taxi association? See how that pointless allegation swings both ways? If you knew anything about civil litigation, you'd know that what is alleged in lawsuit fili…
-
comment
Comment #14271869
Then let them build a case against Uber for its use of Greyball. Why is federal involvement under RICO statutes necessary to do that?
-
comment
Comment #14271865
Because protectionist taxi regulations enacted and enforced by local officials are a local issue. Just because the DOJ can shoehorn a legal argument together to assert jurisdiction…
-
comment
Comment #14271805
In what jurisdiction do I have to report transferring more than $10,000? That's an obligation of the bank, not individuals using banks. (At least in the U.S. Do EU citizens have to…
-
comment
Comment #14271493
No. Why it can be made a federal issue has been successfully outlined by others in this thread. Misleading investigators throughout multiple cities, however, isn't the reason.
-
comment
Comment #14271291
Turkey isn't in the EU.
-
comment
Comment #14271153
>such as his decision to steal Google's self-driving tech When was this proven? So far, those are nothing but allegations in a civil suit.
-
comment
Comment #14271150
Which local governments have tried mounting a substantive case and failed?
-
comment
Comment #14271138
There are plenty of reasons that they shouldn't. You may not agree with the reasons but they exist.
-
comment
Comment #14270226
What does this example scenario have to do with the federal government getting involved in taxi regulations?
-
comment
Comment #14270218
>Not seeing the problem here...? Nope. Let the cities enforce their own laws.
-
comment
Comment #14270187
So what?
-
comment
Comment #14270185
Sure. And that's why the feds should stay out of it.
-
comment
Comment #14270067
The mafia-like, protectionist taxi regulations should be considered the true conspiracy, IMHO.
-
comment
Comment #14269976
Point taken. I still think it's absurd to have a federal investigation over some city's taxi regulations being evaded, but at least I can follow the potential legal logic. Thanks f…
-
comment
Comment #14269959
Yes, but for evading city taxi regulators?!?
-
comment
Comment #14269948
>obstruction of justice Fair point. Personally I still think this is overreach but I can follow the legal footing on that.
-
comment
Comment #14269933
I looked at the enumerated crimes and I don't see "evading city taxi regulations" in there.
-
comment
Comment #14269902
So let the local officials bring a case.
-
comment
Comment #14269854
Sure, but what federal law was broken? I wasn't aware that the federal government enforces local city regulations just because money is moving between states.
-
comment
Comment #14269834
True. But considering RICO's original intent, investigating a software company for evading draconian local taxi regulations seems out of scope.