Viewing profile — boffinism
boffinism
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Apr 21, 2017, 8:06 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 2,571
- Public activity
- 439 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About boffinism
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #35612523
> Is there any reason to believe so? Yes, specificially this article: http://haggardhawksblog.blogspot.com/2015/03/ampersand.html
-
comment
Comment #35612517
Re "I doubt anybody has ever said I per se I" (in the context of alphabet recitation) may I draw your attention to this article[0]: > Up until as recently as the mid 1900s, it was …
-
comment
Comment #35611208
You're missing that "& per se &" would still have been called that even if it wasn't the last item in the list. If the order was "...y, & and z" you'd pronounce it "why and per se …
-
comment
Comment #35610972
No it isn't. The first "and" in "and per se and" isn't a conjunction. So you could actually say: I per se I, O per se O, and and per se and.
-
comment
Comment #35567511
Don't confuse cookie laws with data laws
-
comment
Comment #35567490
These two statements are not incompatible.
-
comment
Comment #35501383
Taking the question at face value, the answer is: massive amounts of capital. And barriers to entry like that make the 'the free market will solve this' argument less convincing.
- story
-
comment
Comment #35397658
Do you think other cultures, who care less about work, care less about food and shelter? Or would you care to elaborate on why work is more necessary for food and shelter in Americ…
- story
-
comment
Comment #35301008
"Aquanauts". "Water sailors". Since the water is implied by the sailor bit (astronauts and aeronauts being effectively "sailors but in space"/"sailors but on the air"), couldn't we…
-
comment
Comment #35258150
> Twofer Goofer HQ's adherence to strict "perfect" rhyme can be tricky for those slant rhyme-inclined. And yet one puzzle they hammer Bard for failing is "Cactus Practice". What ac…
-
comment
Comment #35119793
(These rules apply to American English, not British English. I can't speak for other languages and variants.)
-
comment
Comment #35111070
there's nothing "bad" about phrases like "impressively easy" or "significantly larger". OP just has a weird phobia of utterly reasonable adverbs.
-
comment
Comment #35110907
Oh cool, so adverbs are banned now, are they?
- story
-
comment
Comment #35020002
Being blunt, it sounds to me like you're using wildly inaccurate personality stereotypes to generalise horribly about both software engineers and artists. A software dev who is inc…
-
comment
Comment #35019036
No because: > for the optical illusion to work, you must place the virtual camera at the position of one of your eyes and close the other one.
-
comment
Comment #34846644
Thanks! I'm never sure how the title guidelines (that prohibit editorializing) apply to tweets where there is no title.
- story
-
comment
Comment #34754703
If you spent 20 mins looking, it's not their recommendation system that's failing. It's that you don't like their content (or how their content is portrayed). The recommendation sy…
- story
-
comment
Comment #34646357
I love the idea that social media accounts, like wine, are more valuable if they're sufficiently aged.
-
comment
Comment #34470582
I tried aabbccdd... to make a spiral and it broke at m.
-
comment
Comment #34297888
It has been described as 'mansplaining as a service'