Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — boffinism

boffinism

HN member
Joined
Fri, Apr 21, 2017, 8:06 AM UTC
HN karma
2,571
Public activity
439 items

About boffinism

whyarentyoucoding.com

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #35612523

    > Is there any reason to believe so? Yes, specificially this article: http://haggardhawksblog.blogspot.com/2015/03/ampersand.html

  2. comment
    Comment #35612517

    Re "I doubt anybody has ever said I per se I" (in the context of alphabet recitation) may I draw your attention to this article[0]: > Up until as recently as the mid 1900s, it was …

  3. comment
    Comment #35611208

    You're missing that "& per se &" would still have been called that even if it wasn't the last item in the list. If the order was "...y, & and z" you'd pronounce it "why and per se …

  4. comment
    Comment #35610972

    No it isn't. The first "and" in "and per se and" isn't a conjunction. So you could actually say: I per se I, O per se O, and and per se and.

  5. comment
    Comment #35567511

    Don't confuse cookie laws with data laws

  6. comment
    Comment #35567490

    These two statements are not incompatible.

  7. comment
    Comment #35501383

    Taking the question at face value, the answer is: massive amounts of capital. And barriers to entry like that make the 'the free market will solve this' argument less convincing.

  8. story
  9. comment
    Comment #35397658

    Do you think other cultures, who care less about work, care less about food and shelter? Or would you care to elaborate on why work is more necessary for food and shelter in Americ…

  10. story
  11. comment
    Comment #35301008

    "Aquanauts". "Water sailors". Since the water is implied by the sailor bit (astronauts and aeronauts being effectively "sailors but in space"/"sailors but on the air"), couldn't we…

  12. comment
    Comment #35258150

    > Twofer Goofer HQ's adherence to strict "perfect" rhyme can be tricky for those slant rhyme-inclined. And yet one puzzle they hammer Bard for failing is "Cactus Practice". What ac…

  13. comment
    Comment #35119793

    (These rules apply to American English, not British English. I can't speak for other languages and variants.)

  14. comment
    Comment #35111070

    there's nothing "bad" about phrases like "impressively easy" or "significantly larger". OP just has a weird phobia of utterly reasonable adverbs.

  15. comment
    Comment #35110907

    Oh cool, so adverbs are banned now, are they?

  16. story
  17. comment
    Comment #35020002

    Being blunt, it sounds to me like you're using wildly inaccurate personality stereotypes to generalise horribly about both software engineers and artists. A software dev who is inc…

  18. comment
    Comment #35019036

    No because: > for the optical illusion to work, you must place the virtual camera at the position of one of your eyes and close the other one.

  19. comment
    Comment #34846644

    Thanks! I'm never sure how the title guidelines (that prohibit editorializing) apply to tweets where there is no title.

  20. story
  21. comment
    Comment #34754703

    If you spent 20 mins looking, it's not their recommendation system that's failing. It's that you don't like their content (or how their content is portrayed). The recommendation sy…

  22. story
  23. comment
    Comment #34646357

    I love the idea that social media accounts, like wine, are more valuable if they're sufficiently aged.

  24. comment
    Comment #34470582

    I tried aabbccdd... to make a spiral and it broke at m.

  25. comment
    Comment #34297888

    It has been described as 'mansplaining as a service'