Viewing profile — blux
blux
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Mar 11, 2010, 12:48 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 370
- Public activity
- 164 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About blux
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48349369
Hey fellow TU/e'er :) I followed his course as well, somewhere around 2004/5. Executing man in the middle attacks, writing buffer overflow exploits. Good memories!
- story
-
comment
Comment #45887223
Could not agree more. As a child in the 80s I read a programming book (can't remember the name anymore unfortunately) where the reader was encouraged to write software that is alwa…
-
comment
Comment #45630741
[flagged]
- story
-
comment
Comment #43566779
Seems he is using trade deficit percentages in his chart instead of tariff percentages ... :/
-
comment
Comment #42917259
Could have been if backwards compatibility was not a thing indeed. Move constructors are not needed , they don't solve a 'problem', but improve on previous semantics.
-
comment
Comment #42916019
This is becoming such a tiresome opinion. How are concepts fixing a problem created by previous features to the langue? What about ranges? Auto? Move semantics? Coroutines? Constex…
-
comment
Comment #42601642
AFAIK, 250W is the net energy of light arriving at the wafer after it has reflected off of many mirrors, with a very inefficient process to generate light from the tin plasma on to…
- story
-
comment
Comment #41841170
I wrote this library once; https://github.com/ton/fast_int . Removed `std::atoi` from the benchmarks since it was performing so poorly; not a contender. Should be easy to verify. R…
-
comment
Comment #41835571
Did you verify their claims or are you just calling BS and that's it? The new functions are in fact much faster than their C equivalent (and yes, I did verify that).
-
comment
Comment #40667203
I implemented GJK almost a decade ago now based on this excellent explanation from Casey: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qupqu1xe7Io
-
comment
Comment #39088058
Ok, I'll bite. What happened at Canonical?
-
comment
Comment #38943402
I did not know about `includeIf`...this allows getting rid of the hacks I used to achieve something similar, great!
-
comment
Comment #38692462
There are so many examples in the insect world of mind control its truly bizarre. The other day I encountered an example in David Goulson's recent book Silent Earth ( https://www.g…
-
comment
Comment #38404035
I'm not sure why you are downvoted; I have the exact same on an up-to-date Firefox.
-
comment
Comment #38159789
I didn't know about `jump`, that is super useful.
-
comment
Comment #36443627
For the text rendering part, is there no off-the-shelf library that provides that functionality?
-
comment
Comment #36403582
This times 100 :) It is only recently that I started to realize this and once you do it makes a lot of sense.
-
comment
Comment #36388302
Does anyone know what happened with Herb's idea for zero-overhead exceptions? I remember liking the idea when he presented it at CppCon ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARYP83yNAW…
-
comment
Comment #33852559
I'm wondering, when will programmers be replaced by AI? Or less strong, when is the fun, creative job of programming replaced by entering queries for some AI code bot? I've always …
-
comment
Comment #33721344
Same here, computer flagged, nothing happens.
-
comment
Comment #33706449
I fail to see the point of this, in fact, I think this is a fundamentally flawed approach to dealing with your revision history. The problem is that rebasing commits has the potent…
- story