Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — blux

blux

HN member
Joined
Thu, Mar 11, 2010, 12:48 PM UTC
HN karma
370
Public activity
164 items

About blux

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48349369

    Hey fellow TU/e'er :) I followed his course as well, somewhere around 2004/5. Executing man in the middle attacks, writing buffer overflow exploits. Good memories!

  2. story
  3. comment
    Comment #45887223

    Could not agree more. As a child in the 80s I read a programming book (can't remember the name anymore unfortunately) where the reader was encouraged to write software that is alwa…

  4. comment
    Comment #45630741

    [flagged]

  5. story
  6. comment
    Comment #43566779

    Seems he is using trade deficit percentages in his chart instead of tariff percentages ... :/

  7. comment
    Comment #42917259

    Could have been if backwards compatibility was not a thing indeed. Move constructors are not needed , they don't solve a 'problem', but improve on previous semantics.

  8. comment
    Comment #42916019

    This is becoming such a tiresome opinion. How are concepts fixing a problem created by previous features to the langue? What about ranges? Auto? Move semantics? Coroutines? Constex…

  9. comment
    Comment #42601642

    AFAIK, 250W is the net energy of light arriving at the wafer after it has reflected off of many mirrors, with a very inefficient process to generate light from the tin plasma on to…

  10. story
  11. comment
    Comment #41841170

    I wrote this library once; https://github.com/ton/fast_int . Removed `std::atoi` from the benchmarks since it was performing so poorly; not a contender. Should be easy to verify. R…

  12. comment
    Comment #41835571

    Did you verify their claims or are you just calling BS and that's it? The new functions are in fact much faster than their C equivalent (and yes, I did verify that).

  13. comment
    Comment #40667203

    I implemented GJK almost a decade ago now based on this excellent explanation from Casey: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qupqu1xe7Io

  14. comment
    Comment #39088058

    Ok, I'll bite. What happened at Canonical?

  15. comment
    Comment #38943402

    I did not know about `includeIf`...this allows getting rid of the hacks I used to achieve something similar, great!

  16. comment
    Comment #38692462

    There are so many examples in the insect world of mind control its truly bizarre. The other day I encountered an example in David Goulson's recent book Silent Earth ( https://www.g…

  17. comment
    Comment #38404035

    I'm not sure why you are downvoted; I have the exact same on an up-to-date Firefox.

  18. comment
    Comment #38159789

    I didn't know about `jump`, that is super useful.

  19. comment
    Comment #36443627

    For the text rendering part, is there no off-the-shelf library that provides that functionality?

  20. comment
    Comment #36403582

    This times 100 :) It is only recently that I started to realize this and once you do it makes a lot of sense.

  21. comment
    Comment #36388302

    Does anyone know what happened with Herb's idea for zero-overhead exceptions? I remember liking the idea when he presented it at CppCon ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARYP83yNAW…

  22. comment
    Comment #33852559

    I'm wondering, when will programmers be replaced by AI? Or less strong, when is the fun, creative job of programming replaced by entering queries for some AI code bot? I've always …

  23. comment
    Comment #33721344

    Same here, computer flagged, nothing happens.

  24. comment
    Comment #33706449

    I fail to see the point of this, in fact, I think this is a fundamentally flawed approach to dealing with your revision history. The problem is that rebasing commits has the potent…

  25. story