Viewing profile — blucaz
blucaz
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Oct 09, 2023, 6:07 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 34
- Public activity
- 32 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About blucaz
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #46645083
"While the above attack did use the systemd vsock sshd listener for Escape to Host, the attacker could have just directly listened over the vsock loopback." https://www.openwall.co…
-
comment
Comment #46366756
Maintaining separate upstream sources and downstream patches does provide value. Maybe not to you, but it does. For example, it's trivial from a web browser with a couple of clicks…
-
comment
Comment #46316924
It gracefully falls back if the new option is not available at runtime
-
comment
Comment #44375630
No, the graphics stack needs to be native and in sync for obvious reasons, and that includes the mesa libraries. What can be in the runtime is already in the runtime.
-
comment
Comment #44272591
> The reality is that no such documentation is provided, so the only way to avoid systemd is to become an expert in its internals. The blog post subject of the thread literally lin…
-
comment
Comment #44272535
It's not even that, that whole story's main point was about how an incredibly complex, sophisticated and lengthy social engineering attack was carried out, probably by a nation-sta…
-
comment
Comment #43652104
> I’m somewhat a fan of systemd and I’m interested in immutable images, but I don’t want to build systemd from source: You don't have to, we build packages and publish repositories…
-
comment
Comment #43090514
> So how do I replace any of them with my own, small tool? You write them with an equivalent public interface. > They have no stable interfaces. This is nonsense. All the D-Bus (an…
-
comment
Comment #42738281
> The fact the initramfs is not signed/verified on any desktop Linux distro means secure boot is completely pointless right now on Linux, and is very dissapointing. It is not. Ther…
-
comment
Comment #42037590
> When configuring boot media, like an SD card, for an embedded ssystem that is not the running system where the configuration is occurring, this is an impediment. There is systemd…
-
comment
Comment #42037529
Debian, Ubuntu and all derivatives thereof use initramfs-tools, which does not use systemd in the initrd, and things work just fine
-
comment
Comment #41486674
malloc_info() is not consumed internally but it is only wired up as a debugging utility via systemd-analyze, which is sorely needed when things go bad in strange and weird ways. It…
-
comment
Comment #41118336
For the record, it turned out this was just a series of misunderstandings on the part of the OP on how configuring networking works on Linux, and the differences between how the ke…
-
comment
Comment #40925462
> Systemd-boot, any boot loader, that aims to replicate the things that the kernel does is ultimately going to run into the same problems as grub. We're going to have the font CVEs…
-
comment
Comment #40715957
Yes: it's a joke. Here, have some chills, on the house:
-
comment
Comment #40584623
The fact that YOU have a particular use case doesn't necessarily mean much either. Just customize your configuration accordingly, and move on.
-
comment
Comment #40584599
Or what about, delete it after 10 days it was last accessed (regardless of whether for read or write)? Hint: that's already how tmpfiles.d works
-
comment
Comment #40583025
> Why not just have the installer _ask_ me what configuration I prefer? Because nobody bothered to actually put in some work to implement that. As I've said on the ML, if somebody …
-
comment
Comment #40528240
What a genius idea, how bizarre that nobody ever thought about that before! We just need to get the bus dependencies up first and then... oh. Oh wait. Oh no.
-
comment
Comment #40528196
> kdbus didn't even make it into staging. Project mainline put in some serious work to get where it got. > > And quite probably part of it going better was not insisting on becomin…
-
comment
Comment #40510404
D-Bus will never be removed. Varlink was added because the kernel refused to provide usable IPC primitives, like other OSes have, so a brokered IPC is simply unfeasible in early us…
-
comment
Comment #40510373
> That's my point: Binder got merged before kdbus started development. It didn't, it was merged in 2015, a year after or so. No, staging doesn't count, it's a dumping ground for al…
-
comment
Comment #40503269
By "making it available" it doesn't necessarily mean a fully-working, configured broker, but only having enough working primitives that you can bring up userspace without races, wi…
-
comment
Comment #40500185
kdbus/bus1 were about making IPC primitives available race-free to userspace since the very first moment it is started. Perf was icing on the cake. Binder is Google-only, so nobody…
-
comment
Comment #40499892
No, performance wasn't the main reason (although that was a big part), it was mainly about race conditions. If userspace implements the bus, then only the half of userspace that co…