Viewing profile — blmarket
blmarket
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Feb 17, 2023, 9:04 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 34
- Public activity
- 24 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About blmarket
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49265899
I expect future LLM will refuse to share the reason. "Hey, how did you come up with this idea?" "you have to pay enterprise API to learn this"
-
comment
Comment #49214275
(bit sarcastic) Oracle was always all in on Lawyers, right? No software was their first priority.
-
comment
Comment #49200897
Now it's steak, tomorrow it can be pasta, next year it can be watermelon kimchi.
-
comment
Comment #49104251
Seems like everyone is doing similar... here's mine: https://github.com/blmarket/hmux Idea is to keep everything feel same with tmux, just add what's necessary for agent integratio…
-
comment
Comment #48985487
I don't think there is a lot test harness, given there is a golden implementation (sqlite3), with clear interface (SQL, and sqlite3 db files). Once you slop crappy implementation, …
-
comment
Comment #48649374
Attack is not just on file format itself. Based on the function signature it's possible for a single decoder to generate infinite bytestream - makes a lot of headache to reader imp…
-
comment
Comment #48636926
I think it's due to calibration - practical work related problems are never that simple & easy so naturally people might start from DP formula. D[A,B] := number of ways to navigate…
-
comment
Comment #48547457
Am I the only Korean(or other countries under colonialism) laughing?
-
comment
Comment #48358930
IPO won't lose their ethos. Competition out from their duopoly will.
-
comment
Comment #48240941
It depends on the net wealth we're discussing. I'm sorry if I touched someone who lives with $1M saving. But should I be sorry for someone with $10M, which might be way more than 3…
-
comment
Comment #48239824
So, if we go with 2% wealth tax(instead of 1%) we can cut income tax offset -20%? Go do it right now.
-
comment
Comment #48239787
But why wage earners should support you by paying more taxes? Reduce your spending by 33% to keep up.
-
comment
Comment #48098612
Did you ask whether your friend have a car? I think it's much easier to get the point if the story comes to someone's 10 year old but still okay cars. e.g. Without proper regulatio…
-
comment
Comment #47977671
You should. If it manages to solve the working solutions - then it's great! why would you waste your time on it? It it fails - then it's great! you find your value by solving the t…
-
comment
Comment #47852143
Easy solution - use hyperscalers with super expensive API charge only when latency really matters. Otherwise build your own DC. Easy to expect customers don't care latency that muc…
-
comment
Comment #47186260
> 99% more efficient every 3 years It's 2x efficiency. Then I'd take 50% less power instead of ridiculous 99% less power.
-
comment
Comment #46918188
Some pattern I found from my hobby project. 1. Keep things small and review everything AI written, or 2. Keep things bloated and let AI do whatever it wants within the designated i…
-
comment
Comment #46039842
It's a constraint to process item within limited time (regardless of overproduction or power outage). Matching with the problem description. Surely the reality might be much more c…
-
comment
Comment #45922302
Presto (a.k.a. AWS Athena) might be a faster/better alternative? Also would like to see if 650GB data is available locally.
-
comment
Comment #45879985
Wait, x86? you mean arm64?
-
comment
Comment #43910462
Yeah, tariffs won't increase the price...
-
comment
Comment #43028999
This and several other abuse cases forced my previous work to use code pointers to count 'characters' for user's nickname / status messages. No one wanted to download 9MB simply br…
-
comment
Comment #42941573
Oracle will fight like hell if there is a slightest chance to earn royalty from that trademark. edit: Microsoft or other companies have no financial benefit on that fight. Even Den…
-
comment
Comment #42798284
with "no", there might be additional reason why. But this office jargon allows you to just defer (indefinitely).