Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — blithedale

blithedale

HN member
Joined
Sat, Jan 11, 2020, 6:20 PM UTC
HN karma
37
Public activity
18 items

About blithedale

Grumble grumble grumble.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #25918333

    Truvada is PREP. PRE exposure prophylaxis. PEP =/= PREP. PEP is after the fact treatment, there's more than just Truvada in that protocol. PEP is typically much harder on the body …

  2. comment
    Comment #25128013

    Findings: In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving 240 hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19, a single dose of 200,000 IU of vitamin D3 supplementa…

  3. story
  4. comment
    Comment #24498010

    Thanks for clarifying comments here, much appreciated. I have to think my initial comment was overly harsh as well, given Supplement 3. I think all I can say is that it may be poss…

  5. comment
    Comment #24484164

    I'm not convinced the 2/3 dropout rate of the FMD didn't simply select for people with less aggressive tumors, given that the Intention-To-Treat analysis found no difference in res…

  6. comment
    Comment #24483991

    Good stuff. Also of note is tumor heterogenity. Not only are cancers different between cell origin and across different patients, cancer is not one uniform genetic entity even insi…

  7. comment
    Comment #24483882

    Their "better response rate" touted at the top ignores the 2/3 of women who couldn't carry out the assigned FMD. When you fold back in those 2/3 of people on that arm, the response…

  8. comment
    Comment #24483841

    This is like making people with cancer do an Ironman triathalon. People about to enter hospice and pass on in a few weeks are gonna be way less able to complete it than someone who…

  9. comment
    Comment #24483758

    A lot of people might think "Ah, well, fasting is clearly effective for the 1/3 that are able to carry it out, just gotta make sure you have the willpower to be the 1/3." But hold …

  10. comment
    Comment #24483657

    ARGH. ARGH ARGH ARGH. Almost no one reads these papers when stuff like this gets posted on HN. And there is shameful statistical fuckery afoot in this paper. People are only repeat…

  11. comment
    Comment #24380290

    Except the dosing in this study is a massive supra-physiological bolus that's something like 50x the daily RDV.

  12. comment
    Comment #24380275

    Welcome to every Vitamin D study done ever. I follow some PHD/RD combination researchers on Twitter and they all get together each time one of these studies is done and bang their …

  13. comment
    Comment #24367914

    Thank you thank you thank you. There is a craze for popping Vitamin D related to the raft of observational studies, here... so many of which never find a causal link. Take my own p…

  14. comment
    Comment #24367839

    There are seven results for American trials found on clinicaltrials.gov for Condition= "COIVD19" and Drug = "VitaminD" run by institutions like Harvard/MGH, Brigham, UNC, Arizona S…

  15. comment
    Comment #24367783

    The worst case scenario isn't 'healthier bones'. It's kidney failure - https://www.cmaj.ca/content/191/14/E390 Or fatal hypercalcemia - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s1…

  16. comment
    Comment #22021714

    I suggest folks read the cited research. It's eye-opening here, in a way that's very irritiating. This does not seem like particularly good science journalism. Because of the road …

  17. comment
    Comment #22021708

    You're a cardiology fellow, so you're likely much better versed in this than me, but take a look at the paper cited here: Sure looks like they were doing multiple comparisons until…

  18. comment