Viewing profile — blindmute
blindmute
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jun 17, 2021, 5:45 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 532
- Public activity
- 451 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About blindmute
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #32039643
I disagree with your interpretation of primarily in regards to my comments. My comments are about a wide range of things, and when in ideological threads (curiously permitted const…
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #32009199
You're ignoring the method by which these things are dated. First, if a date was written on the page (extremely rare), it may well have been after the date change happened. The vas…
-
comment
Comment #31992731
> What is react query's role here ? Its role is to do everything you just said in one package, plus other networking features. It fetches, updates the store, subscribes the compone…
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #31967642
An external service fetcher doesn't have integration with React because the entire tree potentially needs to know when the data changed. Once you write the code to subscribe to tho…
-
comment
Comment #31965315
It's a great benefit for a component to be able to specify what data it needs from remote without worrying about if an ancestor or sibling also needed it. React query will only fet…
-
comment
Comment #31932909
My reasoning is that the coffee will cool in a curve having high rate of temperature change at first, and slower later in a long tail until it reaches room temp. Adding the cream w…
-
comment
Comment #31886854
It's not about per capita, it's about total. We can not only reduce their resource usage, but also produce less food ourselves, all for free. It's win-win.
-
comment
Comment #31884106
It would also help the planet greatly if we stopped sending aid to Africa and other poor nations. Without our help, their populations would decline quite a bit, reducing their meat…
-
comment
Comment #31883917
Why is this a problem, exactly? 1. We already produce way more food than the entire world can eat, even if it were distributed equally 2. When population begins butting up against …
-
comment
Comment #31883770
I tried to slap my wife, but my hand was repelled by her PhD force field
-
comment
Comment #31880039
Hmmm, if it wouldn't pass the Senate then I guess a lot of states' constituents don't want this. Sounds like it's better left to a state by state basis.
-
comment
Comment #31879879
There's simply no empirical evidence that you love your wife/mother, so it would be foolish to believe that you do. Until a study is funded there's just no way for you to know. Tru…
-
comment
Comment #31879253
If we only want profitable people represented, we can skip the extra steps and just have a voting fee, or even just a landowning requirement! Then the poors won't be able to screw …
-
comment
Comment #31875300
Because the country was explicitly founded in a way that local matters more. If you want abortions, go to an abortion state. Is it so intolerable that Mississippians as a whole wan…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #31874610
This is exactly how things should work. If you don't like the politics of one state, you should move to another state. States should retain authority over their laws not enumerated…
-
comment
Comment #31874533
If it's the majority opinion it should have no problem being passed in federal or state legislature
-
comment
Comment #31868971
> Any state law that deprives someone of life and / or liberty is unconstitutional. It's not. It's literally not. Stealing food is illegal, even if you were going to die of starvat…
-
comment
Comment #31868800
So true. Glad to see the regression has been reversed, a bit, today.
-
comment
Comment #31868224
Apparently it is unclear to some people, but that's a subordinate clause. It is explaining the following independent clause. "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the secur…
-
comment
Comment #31856040
Which part of "shall not be infringed" is unclear? States cannot make laws overriding the constitution's bill of rights.