Viewing profile — blakefrost

My experience with CloudFlare couldn't be more to the contrary. We rolled it out for a good few months and gave them quite a while to get their act straight. Ultimately, we had to …

Yeah, I agree, and I hope most people make good use of the extra screen real estate -- Full screening a browser on 27 inches would be less than optimal except for when a website is…

Please tell me their spaceship doesn't run on windows.

He mentioned login attempts in the article. Someone tries the wrong password more then a few times and the account gets locked. That should thwart any and all dictionary/brute forc…

If you're referring to that last line, yeah I totally fat fingered that. I fixed it. I'm advocating moving to an absolute system. As in an absolute width, measured here, measured t…

I am confused, but not about this.

Points aren't relative, their absolute. em is great but another subject entirely.

You would think so, but that's not true. Design in points (1/72) and ship in points. I'm telling you, you're stuff is rendering at 1/96th, not native res. Try it out for yourself. …

Do what I say, not what I do. j/k. That's a tumblr theme, I didn't write it and I take no responsibility for it.

This has actually already happened. Just start using resolution independent measures and never look back. I'm telling you, they work.

Don't worry dude. 1pt won't be blurry either. Try it out, you might just like it.

"A CSS pixel is ALWAYS the exact same thing as a screen pixel" Not true. You should reread the article, if you care to, and perhaps check the sources. Even if what you were saying …

OP here. Sure, you can redefine pixel, that's what was done. Why do you need this measure though? 1/96th is so close to points, you might as well just use points and now you're on …