Viewing profile — bionhoward
bionhoward
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Sep 02, 2018, 6:42 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,018
- Public activity
- 710 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About bionhoward
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48562154
It’s amazing how much Python punishes you for modularizing your code
-
comment
Comment #48103575
I’m heavy into rust and never really use golang, but one big benefit of go over rust is compile times are significantly quicker, which could be more fun if you’re running CI checks…
-
comment
Comment #47784739
Yeah it’s a coding beast if you get it dialed in right
-
comment
Comment #47305213
gotta admit i groaned a bit at this because it would make rust more complicated, but on my 2nd read i realized: - some things (compile time bounds checking tensor shapes) are hard …
-
comment
Comment #47282222
Anthropic is not trustworthy for this because they force every Claude Code user to agree to a noncompete while also opting them in to model training. That means, by default, every …
-
comment
Comment #47241936
surprisingly accurate! Is Gary the AI equivalent of the “nothing ever happens” guy?
-
comment
Comment #47052765
genius, great idea and follow through, please keep it up, this could improve the ML industry tremendously, maybe some einops inspired interface for this would be good?
-
comment
Comment #47029343
building this openclaw thing that competes with openai using codex is against the openai terms of service, which say you can't use it to make stuff that competes with them. but the…
-
comment
Comment #47018905
signal should just add better API / bot stuff and then we could all use that. there's no way OpenAI would be trustworthy for this; slack certainly isn't
-
comment
Comment #46726068
found a bug searching for "collagen": Failed to execute 'removeChild' on 'Node': The node to be removed is not a child of this node. Something broke. We're working on it, but in th…
-
comment
Comment #46600921
Yes! The paywalled SQL documents are a big annoyance
-
comment
Comment #46579547
Yup, I’ve been crowing about these customer noncompetes for years now and it’s clear Anthropic has one of the worst ones. The real kicker is, since Claude Code can do anything, you…
-
comment
Comment #46551558
Why act like it’s a mystery when the Claude Code repo clearly explains: > When you use Claude Code, we collect feedback, which includes usage data (such as code acceptance or rejec…
-
comment
Comment #46404663
Would SRAM make weight updates prohibitive vs DRAM?
-
comment
Comment #46370514
Gemini is absolutely not Gryffindor since it auto-opts users into training AI on their codebases without informed consent
-
comment
Comment #46134537
Anthropic also has legal terms that say no one is allowed to use the service for anything work related, but nobody seems to care
-
comment
Comment #46134494
Cursor still wins over Claude Code because Cursor has privacy mode
-
comment
Comment #46134320
I think it’s more about deciding how much to think about stuff and not a model router per se. 5 and 5.1 get progressively better calibrated reasoning token budgets. Also o3 and “re…
-
comment
Comment #45969362
model provider CLIs are a trap, less freedom of choice, less privacy, way more prohibitions buried in the fine print
-
comment
Comment #45806020
Good reason to use Cursor, you can insta-switch to whatever model you want and even run diverse models from different providers at the same time. If one of em isn’t working then yo…
-
comment
Comment #45598764
And here I thought it was a pedantic word for “data box”
-
comment
Comment #45597407
Is using these terminal agents with customer noncompete and no privacy questionable when cursor has the same models and privacy mode?
-
comment
Comment #45552968
The point is it’s sucking your data into some amorphous big brother dataset without explicitly asking you if you want that to happen first. Opt out AI features are generally rude, …
-
comment
Comment #45356370
Rust for everything, I could explain but it would get rude
-
comment
Comment #45356167
Rust feels easy for me, could it be we’re just used to what we use more? Anyway, it’s all pretty easy, what’s the use arguing which of multiple easy things is easiest?