Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — biglearner1day

biglearner1day

HN member
Joined
Sat, Jul 16, 2022, 8:21 PM UTC
HN karma
26
Public activity
28 items

About biglearner1day

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #33546033

    > If someone forgets to lock their door and a thief gets in and robs them, do you think it's fair to "blame" the person who forgot to lock their door? No, but let's say they've bou…

  2. comment
    Comment #33545633

    > I smell a fair hint of victim blaming here. Why is that a bad thing? You should absolutely blame and hold the victim responsible and accountable for their part.

  3. comment
    Comment #33343938

    I suppose the question you're asking is why we've socially moved away from doing stuff just for fun in an effort to make a “passive” income and monetize as much of our time as poss…

  4. comment
    Comment #32951956

    > So you’re in favor of the government controlling political speech that you don’t agree with? Where did I say or imply any of that? >Nowhere in the DI&E training I’ve taken at the…

  5. comment
    Comment #32951501

    Hah, nice. My personal favorite would be wtfpl[0]. [0] http://www.wtfpl.net/

  6. comment
    Comment #32951395

    I find it amusing you continue with the Cathy Newman reenactment. >So the government should pass laws that tell private companies what they can’t talk about. Yes, they should not a…

  7. comment
    Comment #32951148

    I think that the last sentence already answered all the questions you just asked. "The government should keep social media platforms in check and protect their citizens against cen…

  8. comment
    Comment #32950967

    When you want to provide others with reliable software, but are unable to keep your personal beliefs and politics out of it.

  9. comment
    Comment #32950722

    Please don't pull a Cathy Newman. Like I said, for the third time: government influence has a negative outcome in most cases. I'm not sure how you got to a different conclusion. Th…

  10. comment
    Comment #32950605

    This is a win. Despite how we feel about Russia and its government, it's a good move to decrease Microsoft, Apple, and Google their global power. Now we hope that the open source c…

  11. comment
    Comment #32950561

    I was not disagreeing with you in the initial reply, two things can be true at the same time. Like I said; government influence has a negative outcome in most cases, but allowing s…

  12. comment
    Comment #32950498

    I understand that you have a rich imagination, please do not use it to justify censorship.

  13. comment
    Comment #32949608

    I hope you can see the hypocrisy and bias in your desire to ban ideas you dislike – it's dangerous. A better outcome would be to fight bad ideas with good ideas.

  14. comment
    Comment #32949308

    > It amazes me that people want to give the government this much power. It amazes me that we let social media platforms run freely with whichever narrative, ideology they enforce. …

  15. comment
    Comment #32949235

    > I hope that if someone writes a book saying people should physically harm you One could argue that calls for gender-affirming surgeries or treatments are equally, if not, worse. …

  16. comment
    Comment #32438709

    I believe you completely missed the joke.

  17. comment
    Comment #32437633

    > Yeah, but then they would imprison the CEO and not the developer. While they do get blamed, the Netherlands doesn't seem to care all that much. They seem very selective with how …

  18. comment
    Comment #32437558

    Can't let that happen! The anti-money laundering excuse got old, which excuse will they use next? Anti-terrorism?

  19. comment
    Comment #32437451

    Please do remind me how many persons named in the Panama Papers have been arrested, or had their assets seized.

  20. comment
    Comment #32437367

    I would challenge you to prove that they actively advertised their service as such. Stop spreading misinformation.

  21. comment
    Comment #32437357

    > Actually they go after the people committing the crime AND those facilitating it. But only if it is in their interest. We don't see other services and platforms sanctioned for fa…

  22. comment
    Comment #32437246

    And it is always under the guise of anti-money laundering, anti-terrorism or whatever other reason they can find to excuse their inexcusable actions. Take mass government surveilla…

  23. comment
    Comment #32437211

    > Anonymous cash transactions So not crypto.

  24. comment
    Comment #32437129

    > They have the technical means to control what goes on there or not. Imagine the scenario wherein potential "illegal" crypto is mixed through another service. How would you expect…

  25. comment
    Comment #32437085

    I doubt that would be the case given his history and method of working