Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — big85

big85

HN member
Joined
Sun, Apr 26, 2026, 5:06 AM UTC
HN karma
363
Public activity
72 items

About big85

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49232946

    LumiWeather for AmigaOS runs on 2 MB RAM.

  2. comment
    Comment #49160509

    UK Parliament accepting submissions for evidence regarding the effect of the Online Safety Act (including its failures and detrimental effects, I should note). Deadline is 7 Septem…

  3. story
  4. comment
    Comment #49148914

    All this ostensibly to keep teenage boys from watching Pornhub (when parental controls already exist). The real reason, of course, is to force people to connect strong real-life id…

  5. comment
    Comment #49148855

    So much for the EU's mission to reduce e-waste.

  6. comment
    Comment #49049599

    This event is excellent advertisement for GrapheneOS and its privacy and security features.

  7. comment
    Comment #49030812

    The Star Trek: The Next Generation episode "The Measure of a Man" discusses this topic. Data, an android, is put on trial to determine whether he has personhood, or is merely a mac…

  8. comment
    Comment #48963792

    It's bizarre to see 8GB spoken of as barely sufficient for basic uses. I remember when the baseline was measured in megabytes.

  9. comment
    Comment #48895869

    If you don't fight government overreach now, it becomes permanent.

  10. comment
    Comment #48826584

    There's also Nectarine Demoscene Radio: https://www.scenestream.net/demovibes/

  11. comment
    Comment #48819897

    No, I want to know specifically.

  12. comment
    Comment #48819680

    The Wikipedia entry on Chat Control doesn't go into enough detail on what exactly it does , only the history of its legislative process. Can someone update it?

  13. comment
    Comment #48717449

    Parental controls. Client-side blocking of content. Apple's parental controls are so good that parents give young children unsupervised internet access--the entire generation if iP…

  14. comment
    Comment #48717407

    The existing paradigm is on-device parental controls. It's worked for the past 30 years, and the alternative is forcing everyone to show government ID to use websites.

  15. comment
    Comment #48623968

    I vaguely recall a story about an employee who discovered that their company's sales department was acquiring a lot of new customers to hit some metrics, but rarely actually closin…

  16. comment
    Comment #48610781

    Most VPN companies won't implement age verification, because their purpose is privacy. This is really an attempt to ban VPNs. This won't be popular when 70% of the population uses …

  17. comment
    Comment #48610694

    UK government has been talking about digital ID for a while now. The existing verification methods are too vulnerable to cheating (fake beards, fake ID, borrow dad's credit card, e…

  18. comment
    Comment #48610642

    > You don’t. You can’t. So everyone gets carded. Exactly. A little at a time. First it's adult sites, because if you need to show ID to buy alcohol, shouldn't you need ID to buy po…

  19. comment
    Comment #48605459

    I suspect something like this is on the way, in the long term. Every site has some Cloudflare captcha or the like to guard against the AI scraper bots. Eventually, we may need some…

  20. comment
    Comment #48604595

    I wonder why the rating code is so complex. Pornhub.com has this code enabled, but it also uses a simpler . 4chan also uses the latter.

  21. comment
    Comment #48604107

    We have parental controls on devices. The change forced by the UK government is to give control to corporations, instead of the parents. Parents are much better at knowing their ow…

  22. comment
    Comment #48604053

    About 2 million adults in the UK don't have government-issued photo ID. Certainly many 16-17 year olds will have trouble verifying their age. They're blocking huge sectors of the U…

  23. comment
    Comment #48599117

    Indeed. I don't see why the verification process has to be done once per user per website , instead of once per user . That maximizes costs, inconvenience, privacy risks, and compl…

  24. comment
    Comment #48599047

    This is bizarre, then, because the on-device Apple system just enables the existing parental controls by default, while the online verification systems are easily cirvumvented.

  25. comment
    Comment #48598372

    There's still the issue of how to verify the user to give them that 1 bit. The current tools do not trust the user or the user's device, because the user could lie or modify the so…