Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — biasedbrain

biasedbrain

HN member
Joined
Mon, Jul 05, 2021, 9:05 PM UTC
HN karma
22
Public activity
35 items

About biasedbrain

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #28035488

    Unfortunately, [3] mentions the 97% consensus nonsense, making the rest of it less credible as well.

  2. comment
    Comment #28035459

    Still, nothing life threatening has happened so far, all the doomsday things are projections of the future.

  3. comment
    Comment #28033065

    There is a huge difference between "humans affect the climate" and "we are all going to die within a couple of years because of human's effects on the climate".

  4. comment
    Comment #28033056

    No, headlines like that is how "believers" argue. Just cut out the hyperbole and present reasonable, verifiable arguments, not appeals to authority.

  5. comment
    Comment #28033033

    And you think it is important that it should have been clicked and read? Why?

  6. comment
    Comment #28033031

    Announcing the paper with such hyperbole makes me less likely to want to read it. It just makes it very unlikely to live up to the hype. I wonder if you have read the paper, btw?

  7. comment
    Comment #28029176

    One group of scientists, who can't imagine that their self invented model could be wrong, can't imagine any other reasons than man made changes for the results of their model simul…

  8. comment
    Comment #28028974

    There seem to be companies that embrace WFH, so if I was in that situation, I would strive to become employed at such a company.

  9. comment
    Comment #28028730

    I have nothing against work just being work, but I think there are different types of companies for a reason. If you want work to just be work, you can choose a company that treats…

  10. comment
    Comment #28028699

    If they learned that they have awful coworkers, they can quit again. I just don't get the sense of entitlement many people seem to have.

  11. comment
    Comment #28027379

    Didn't they choose their jobs, and with that, their co-workers? I'd like to see them argue "I don't want to come to the office because I don't like to be surrounded by people like …

  12. comment
    Comment #28019286

    Still, it is mostly a cosmetic problem, while we are supposed to believe that global warming will kill us all in a short amount of time. So the priorities should be clear.

  13. comment
    Comment #28009027

    No it doesn't. The interest on the mortgage can be as low as 0.5%, so even if you pay in cash, you would only be at 1,5% yields (with my generous example of achieving 1% yields via…

  14. comment
    Comment #28006522

    Where can you get 9% yield on housing? Where I live, you can only buy houses at prices that are above what you can get back in rents. You are very lucky if you can get to 1% yields…

  15. comment
    Comment #27929191

    He is rich because he provides you with stuff you want and are willing to pay for. Nobody forces you to buy from Amazon. It is not your money anymore if you gave it to him in excha…

  16. comment
    Comment #27903687

    The headline says there was a swatting, though.

  17. comment
    Comment #27903671

    "then there's this overall trend of stagnating wages for everyone except owners of capital." So people should better buy some capital! Also the lament about stagnating wages glosse…

  18. comment
    Comment #27903210

    I don't get what is so depressing from the article? Because the rich can afford it, and the poor can't? How do they imagine it should work instead?

  19. comment
    Comment #27857256

    The ideology is that differences in behavior are merely the result of oppression (via social norms) by the mythical patriarchy (which apparently isn't perpetrated by men, according…

  20. comment
    Comment #27824781

    "I feel safe in the assumption that it is “men unfairly push to women while they go off to have fun at work” in precisely zero of them." But you don't actually know the reasons? "y…

  21. comment
    Comment #27821174

    Um, no - women in the west have free choice of careers. Women in Saudi Arabia don't have free choice. Was your comment serious? Do you truly believe women in the west are so oppres…

  22. comment
    Comment #27821161

    So what is the feminist theory why men don't share equally? So feminists believe women should give away some of their privilege of time with their children, for the benefit of men?…

  23. comment
    Comment #27821106

    Really? Then why do governments feel they have to force men to take time off? Men in the relationship are typically seen as the "arm" of the patriarchy. It is true that in this cas…

  24. comment
    Comment #27818962

    I didn't have the same experience. I took a lot of time off and think/hope I bonded just fine. I feel I was privileged to be ale to afford it, or rather, I just decided to afford i…

  25. comment
    Comment #27818308

    I suppose the article doesn't mention the real reason: that it is the privilege of mothers to spend time with their children, because they invested and risked more to have them (or…