Viewing profile — bhk
bhk
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Dec 06, 2015, 6:18 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 972
- Public activity
- 348 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About bhk
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49225062
Working with the browser technology stack is living in a dystopian world of overcomplicated, often duplicative features defined in many thousands of pages of specifications, often …
-
comment
Comment #49224446
Blackpill depression post complaining about "blackpill depression circklejerks"...
-
comment
Comment #49076991
There's a lot missing in this article. Obvious follow-up questions unanswered.
-
comment
Comment #48209417
Not just the string-related functions. If you want robust error checking, re-entrant code, and bounds checking performed in library functions (instead of performing bespoke validat…
-
comment
Comment #48209141
Any opinion voiced on the Internet can manipulate AI responses. Can Google suppress that?
-
comment
Comment #47344366
"The more laws, the less justice." -- Cicero
-
comment
Comment #47257260
Thanks for the references. I think you will agree that the bulk of your comment employs a post-set-theory nomenclature. Regarding "if you were to choose a point completely at rando…
-
comment
Comment #47254239
Ah, but it's worse than this. The truly ambitious ladder climber creates not just unnecessarily complicated abstractions, but organizations. Processes for people to follow. Infrast…
-
comment
Comment #47254152
Let me guess: the point of the interview was to see if he was a "team player".
-
comment
Comment #47202453
I think you are getting away from my point, which pertains to what the article said, which is that mathematicians thought there were "gaps". What mathematician? Can I see the origi…
-
comment
Comment #47199380
That's not a "gap" that you find by "zooming in". And how can it be a gap when it is occupied?
-
comment
Comment #47199350
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Can you cite any claims by mathematicians that there were "gaps"? It isn't even true for rational numbers that you can identify…
-
comment
Comment #47160839
And by the way, what the Hell is up with all these people claiming that two spaces is an obsolete typewriter-era pre-proportional-font thing? Narrow proportional spaces make two sp…
-
comment
Comment #47067631
Funny enough, vanity sizing strikes there too. The purported waist size of a pair of Levi's is off by almost three inches. One might argue that the size on their label is not suppo…
-
comment
Comment #46820514
Hold on there. High fiber consumption increases the excretion of cholesterol, by reducing the reabsorption of the cholesterol in bile. The liver produces cholesterol for bile, whic…
-
comment
Comment #46814907
According to Anthropic: "We never reduce model quality due to demand, time of day, or server load." https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/a-postmortem-of-three-...
-
comment
Comment #46548180
1g/lb is in fact a popular target among bodybuilders. Much research indicates 0.5 to 0.7 g/lb provides most of the benefits, with continuing but diminishing gains above 0.7 g/lb. A…
-
comment
Comment #45687600
It's not just attention to detail. They seem to have abandoned some core design principles like visibility/discoverability.
-
comment
Comment #45494788
$11.79 in my neighborhood.
-
comment
Comment #45478720
Re: "99% of the time" ... this is an ambiguous sample space. Soundness of results clearly depends on the questions being asked. For what set of questions does the 99% guarantee hol…
-
comment
Comment #45161209
Consider this analogy: Instead of using a root command shell, it is wise to use an account with appropriately restricted capabilities, to limit the downsides of mistakes. Cloud ser…
-
comment
Comment #44693881
Ironic. Isn't Nature the worst offender?
-
comment
Comment #44659356
Oscullation/"anticipation" in transitions is so gimmicky and cartoonish. Living things don't move like that, and mechanical things don't unless they are broken, chintzy, or poorly …
-
comment
Comment #44625411
"Scientists reveal a previously unidentified term for a widely known phenomenon"
-
comment
Comment #44543205
What does this impact? 90% of sites on the internet? Just a couple of low-traffic sites?