Viewing profile — bfg_9k
bfg_9k
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Jul 07, 2025, 7:21 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 82
- Public activity
- 64 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About bfg_9k
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47131334
Whats so hard about taking the iPad out of they're hands? or laptop or whatever, once you catch them on sites they shouldnt be on?
-
comment
Comment #46299035
I mean, the guy was constantly high on nootropics and they had no idea what actual investments FTX made. I'd imagine most of the time was just spent untangling that web, his case w…
-
comment
Comment #46142827
I find it so weird that you say public companies being 'evil' (which is to turn a profit) is a problem, yet you also say you'd like for companies to exist on the public market so t…
-
comment
Comment #46116598
It's the old totalitarian playbook. Make everyone a criminal then selectively apply the law.
-
comment
Comment #46116580
There doesn't need to be a solution that works for everyone. It doesn't matter how many barriers you put in place, people will always get scammed - so don't punish the other capabl…
-
comment
Comment #46041385
And yet people don't realise that Epstein was talking in clear text for years through a gmail account that the government could access - and the powers that be didn't do anything a…
-
comment
Comment #45984961
Awesome read. I always love Poszar's work, it's a shame that these days he's no longer working at CS - since most of his work is now stuck behind a paywall.
-
comment
Comment #45843886
1P is closed source and have had a number of breaches in the past. Bitwarden have had none that I'm aware of, and they're FOSS. I however have been preferring ProtonPass lately (al…
-
comment
Comment #45779814
No, it's not. Person A buys stock 1, stock one goes from $10 to $15. Person A makes $5. Person B buys it at $15 and then it pays a $1 dividend, person B makes $1. It's not zero sum…
-
comment
Comment #45778973
Because stock trading isn't zero sum.
-
comment
Comment #45741317
Speech?
-
comment
Comment #45729899
An interesting article that confirms something I've often been annoyed about - in Australia most of the top universities don't use GPAs but WAMs (weighted average marks). In a GPA …
-
comment
Comment #45573877
Principles don't exist in a vacuum. When viewing someone else, you only consider them 'principled' because of the context they exist in. In a world where everyone donates 50% of th…
-
comment
Comment #45565517
If they were run well, then you wouldn't be able to improve on them by buying them.
-
comment
Comment #45564525
Of which, some of that is PE funds. KKR for instance is publicly listed.
-
comment
Comment #45564522
They don't receive bonuses until they exit.
-
comment
Comment #45564514
Right, which implies that the business was not run well, or at the least didn't reach its full potential.
-
comment
Comment #45564507
It's most certainly not the same. An asset manager going broke because they bought some bad loans is infinitely better off for the public at large than a bank becoming insolvent an…
-
comment
Comment #45564505
For the owners? Yeah, they do typically. For the service they provide stakeholders other than the owners? Probably not.
-
comment
Comment #45564504
Believe it or not, businesses don't exist to provide you a "good service" they exist to make money. So yes, they do in fact force firms to operate better when they attain a higher …
-
comment
Comment #45564501
Read Matt Levine's newsletter, it's a VERY simple business model built on financial engineering (it's rare they do something "novel"). But broadly, if you've got money in any sort …
-
comment
Comment #45564490
That was Broadcom and not a PE fund?
-
comment
Comment #45563606
> But imagine a world where every strong business goes private and only failing businesses are public. That's the opposite of what happens with PE. PE firms don't buy fairly priced…
-
comment
Comment #45563582
Regulations are what lead to private credit being what it is today. Post Dodd-Frank banks are unable to take on a lot of the lending risk with these style of transactions anymore w…
-
comment
Comment #45546307
A 25% move in crypto isn't a catastrophic swing. Nor is $6bn in liquidations for some leveraged traders. If they're going to liquidate anything because they need the cash, it will …