Viewing profile — benzible
benzible
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jan 26, 2017, 5:57 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,616
- Public activity
- 334 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About benzible
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48517884
He keeps trying: https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2026/06/08/sam-bankman-fried... Hasn't succeeded yet, probably because he doesn't have the money, also too publicly associated with…
-
comment
Comment #48517813
That is not how any of this works. He was convicted of fraud, and fraud was committed the moment he transferred the funds to Alameda. That he placed some bets that worked out, like…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48407486
Of course. Trump isn't aware of "details" like this. But he's very much on board with the "own the libs" project, the project of helping fossil fuel, and he appointed the people wh…
-
comment
Comment #48394009
I wouldn't assume that this is about cost cutting. If the goal were saving money, the cheapest option by far would be to leave the hardware in the water and just stop funding the m…
-
comment
Comment #48312182
In the context of Claude Code, "honest" usually means that the agent took a shortcut, skipped requirements, etc. It's the model giving itself credit for admitting to failing rather…
-
comment
Comment #47731836
And I love seeing sentiments attributed to me, in quotes even, that I didn't state or imply, and certainly don't believe. "Critical" by itself is not a synonym for "slanted". Howev…
-
comment
Comment #47727732
> You've extrapolated all this just from what I wrote? says the guy who said "certainly intended by the authors" based on... what they wrote? On top of that "Put the keyboard down …
-
comment
Comment #47727173
> my personal stance is that the critical tone was both intended by the authors You may think we are on the same side. You don't understand what side I'm on. "Lol". Your "personal …
-
comment
Comment #47726664
Are you arguing that because the authors knew the pattern they were documenting was unflattering, the piece is somehow compromised? That they clearly had an agenda? That's called r…
-
comment
Comment #47713811
Like maybe this guy? https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/sam-altman-tech... Or this guy? https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/18/jared-...
-
comment
Comment #47707140
If you would expect a typical Trump political appointee, as Colby is, to have even basic historical knowledge, then you may not be paying close attention.
-
comment
Comment #47450541
He did come up with the img tag, without which the web would have been gopher. There's ample reason to dislike him without claiming that he hasn't done anything real.
-
comment
Comment #47344507
FYI, claude code “auto” mode may launch as soon as tomorrow: https://awesomeagents.ai/news/claude-code-auto-mode-research...
- comment
-
comment
Comment #47336225
Nope. Me too.
-
comment
Comment #47221830
And the legality of it as well.
-
comment
Comment #47075503
We mostly agree. I'm really just making the point that focusing blame on the capitulators lets the people wielding state power off the hook. I suppose you could take the position t…
-
comment
Comment #47053510
That's not what I said. I said it isn't cowardice you can blame on the network instead of the FCC, which is what the parent comment did by saying the fault lies "more with CBS." CB…
-
comment
Comment #47049896
The chilling effect is the entire point. An FCC source literally told CNN, "the threat is the point." CBS isn't being randomly skittish. Paramount needs regulatory approval for its…
-
comment
Comment #47049835
"Unobjectionable editorial reasons" is Orwellian framing. This is not how journalism works, and the fact that a major news org is now being operated this way is a five alarm fire, …
-
comment
Comment #47048688
Great, detailed explanation of the "weird formatting": https://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/2026/02/02/whats-up-with-all-th... (I knew it was "quoted printable" as soon as I saw it but the…
-
comment
Comment #46873050
You are arguing against something I didn't say. I never claimed bias doesn't exist. My point is that having previously criticized someone is not evidence of bias. You are treating …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #46865704
Having previously criticized someone doesn't make your technical analysis biased. It just means you noticed similar problems previously. Conversely, "I used to support him so I'm n…