Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — benzible

benzible

HN member
Joined
Thu, Jan 26, 2017, 5:57 PM UTC
HN karma
1,616
Public activity
334 items

About benzible

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48517884

    He keeps trying: https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2026/06/08/sam-bankman-fried... Hasn't succeeded yet, probably because he doesn't have the money, also too publicly associated with…

  2. comment
    Comment #48517813

    That is not how any of this works. He was convicted of fraud, and fraud was committed the moment he transferred the funds to Alameda. That he placed some bets that worked out, like…

  3. comment
  4. comment
    Comment #48407486

    Of course. Trump isn't aware of "details" like this. But he's very much on board with the "own the libs" project, the project of helping fossil fuel, and he appointed the people wh…

  5. comment
    Comment #48394009

    I wouldn't assume that this is about cost cutting. If the goal were saving money, the cheapest option by far would be to leave the hardware in the water and just stop funding the m…

  6. comment
    Comment #48312182

    In the context of Claude Code, "honest" usually means that the agent took a shortcut, skipped requirements, etc. It's the model giving itself credit for admitting to failing rather…

  7. comment
    Comment #47731836

    And I love seeing sentiments attributed to me, in quotes even, that I didn't state or imply, and certainly don't believe. "Critical" by itself is not a synonym for "slanted". Howev…

  8. comment
    Comment #47727732

    > You've extrapolated all this just from what I wrote? says the guy who said "certainly intended by the authors" based on... what they wrote? On top of that "Put the keyboard down …

  9. comment
    Comment #47727173

    > my personal stance is that the critical tone was both intended by the authors You may think we are on the same side. You don't understand what side I'm on. "Lol". Your "personal …

  10. comment
    Comment #47726664

    Are you arguing that because the authors knew the pattern they were documenting was unflattering, the piece is somehow compromised? That they clearly had an agenda? That's called r…

  11. comment
    Comment #47713811

    Like maybe this guy? https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/sam-altman-tech... Or this guy? https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/18/jared-...

  12. comment
    Comment #47707140

    If you would expect a typical Trump political appointee, as Colby is, to have even basic historical knowledge, then you may not be paying close attention.

  13. comment
    Comment #47450541

    He did come up with the img tag, without which the web would have been gopher. There's ample reason to dislike him without claiming that he hasn't done anything real.

  14. comment
    Comment #47344507

    FYI, claude code “auto” mode may launch as soon as tomorrow: https://awesomeagents.ai/news/claude-code-auto-mode-research...

  15. comment
  16. comment
    Comment #47336225

    Nope. Me too.

  17. comment
    Comment #47221830

    And the legality of it as well.

  18. comment
    Comment #47075503

    We mostly agree. I'm really just making the point that focusing blame on the capitulators lets the people wielding state power off the hook. I suppose you could take the position t…

  19. comment
    Comment #47053510

    That's not what I said. I said it isn't cowardice you can blame on the network instead of the FCC, which is what the parent comment did by saying the fault lies "more with CBS." CB…

  20. comment
    Comment #47049896

    The chilling effect is the entire point. An FCC source literally told CNN, "the threat is the point." CBS isn't being randomly skittish. Paramount needs regulatory approval for its…

  21. comment
    Comment #47049835

    "Unobjectionable editorial reasons" is Orwellian framing. This is not how journalism works, and the fact that a major news org is now being operated this way is a five alarm fire, …

  22. comment
    Comment #47048688

    Great, detailed explanation of the "weird formatting": https://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/2026/02/02/whats-up-with-all-th... (I knew it was "quoted printable" as soon as I saw it but the…

  23. comment
    Comment #46873050

    You are arguing against something I didn't say. I never claimed bias doesn't exist. My point is that having previously criticized someone is not evidence of bias. You are treating …

  24. comment
  25. comment
    Comment #46865704

    Having previously criticized someone doesn't make your technical analysis biased. It just means you noticed similar problems previously. Conversely, "I used to support him so I'm n…