Viewing profile — benkuhn
benkuhn
HN member- Joined
- Tue, May 12, 2015, 4:07 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,366
- Public activity
- 72 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About benkuhn
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #46728369
The time lost estimates here are comically implausible--if Apple bugs were wasting 32m person-years per year, with around 1.5b Apple product users total, this would imply that the …
- comment
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #28321055
I'm not an evolutionary biologist, but it seems to me that the claimed magnitude of the change is wildly implausibly fast from an evolutionary perspective. I'm confused that neithe…
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #26819799
Yeah, in particular you need headphones whose 3.5mm cable is detachable. Thanks for flagging, I should have included a warning! For other headphones you can use the various flavors…
-
comment
Comment #26819114
It's also really easy to have high quality audio! The author recommends a "podcasting" microphone, but a $35 standalone headset mic[1] is almost as good and much easier to use. If …
-
comment
Comment #26819061
Shot in the dark, but many of my Linux coworkers have a problem where their video chat software sets their mic volume/gain to 100%, which causes horrible sounding clipping. Check y…
-
comment
Comment #26815104
For more concrete data: If you look at their current "key ideas" page,[1] they go over 4 categories of high-impact careers (notably including government/policy) and then say "if yo…
-
comment
Comment #26814429
This article completely mischaracterizes the beliefs of most of the people quoted or referenced, then engages with those beliefs only via asserting the opposite without any support…
-
comment
Comment #26376109
HN should require (non-randomized) in the title for this kind of thing, the same way it requires (2014) or (pdf).
-
comment
Comment #25935964
I think you took me to be arguing for a stronger claim than I actually was. My preferred paradigm is also roughly “idiomatic go or rust.” But the OP isn’t arguing for idiomatic-go-…
-
comment
Comment #25935283
The author’s OO example is hard to understand, but they’re wrong about why. It’s not bad because it’s OO, but that it’s very badly done OO: the class couples two different concerns…
-
comment
Comment #25408281
Thanks for the recommendation! Sounds like I may have just been reading the wrong books :)
-
comment
Comment #25131960
Oh, great! And the prediction market did not beat polls (it tied with them on swing states and beat them on safe states, as I speculated). I guess between this and the other commen…
-
comment
Comment #25131648
Sorry, that was imprecise. My impression is that, at least on some prediction markets, transaction fees (and maybe also inflation?) make it low-return to buy high-probability contr…
-
comment
Comment #25131378
This is a shoddy analysis. 1. There's a statistical gadget specifically for doing this—a "scoring rule" [1] which is a principled way to compare different probabilistic predictions…