Viewing profile — bem94
bem94
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Dec 12, 2016, 9:06 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,251
- Public activity
- 171 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About bem94
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48266040
I have only read a few passages (and some of the excellent quotes others have shared here), but I find the underlying message here so much more compelling than those found in the v…
-
comment
Comment #48026179
All national agencies I'm aware of do not support QKD except in "very specific cases" and instead recommend Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC). From the UK NCSC [1]: > QKD does not pr…
-
comment
Comment #47547014
I'd expect a finding / paper like this to be submitted to the IACR ePrint server [1] to bring it to the attention of the cryptographic community. I can't see that it's been submitt…
- story
-
comment
Comment #43087599
> I find the suddenness, almost haste to be quite interesting. > But there is a clear change around 2022, 2023. I think that's probably because the NIST competition [1] to choose t…
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #32524461
> To me what is most surprising is that the attack seemingly came out of nowhere, This wasn't my understanding at all. The specific issue in isogeny based cryptography which the at…
- story
-
comment
Comment #31293394
It's possible, but it is _a lot_ of work! You'd basically be building a cryptographic module (industry standard term, with a lot of specs and requirements to go a long with it), wh…
- story
-
comment
Comment #29422319
In lots of places this makes sense. E.g. lots of embedded ARM platforms have a separate AES / ECC accelerator peripheral. The trouble comes when you need to share access to a memor…
-
comment
Comment #29419962
Direct links to some of the latest specs: - Scalar crypto: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-crypto/releases - Vectors: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-v-spec/releases - Bitmanip: http…
-
comment
Comment #29419943
There is some overlap. There's the "Zbkb" (horrible name, I know) extension which contains a subset of instructions from the larger bitmanip extensions which are very useful for cr…
-
comment
Comment #28396697
The algorithm specific instructions are all optional. You can have AES without SM4 or vice versa. RISC-V is great like that, it's designed to be modular. > instead of requiring the…
-
comment
Comment #28395835
It means that each instruction reads no more than two general purpose registers (i.e. inputs), and writes at most one. When you build CPUs, register files are expensive components,…
-
comment
Comment #28395671
> for those who don't feel like reading the spec: I'm biased, but the spec is supposed to be very accessible to people without a cryptography background. There's a section on who t…
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #26003306
The point is that RISC-V allows people to build their own tweaked / extended processors without having to pay an ARM and a leg for it.
-
comment
Comment #26002980
Right you are, that's the group responsible. It's something of a priority for RISC-V international right now, because of exactly this worry. RISC-V International is sometimes reall…
-
comment
Comment #26002641
> I can't imagine RISC-V beyond niche applications unless someone publishes a more strictly specified version of it that provides a unified platform. They're working on this right …
-
comment
Comment #25944650
What does "moral diabetes" mean?
-
comment
Comment #25943749
In a plea for accuracy, can we be specific about which type of Diabetes we are talking about? They are _very_ different, both in how they are caused and how they are managed.