Viewing profile — beltsazar
beltsazar
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Nov 02, 2013, 3:51 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 846
- Public activity
- 194 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About beltsazar
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49170208
> To me the severity has nothing to do with how popular is a code path, but whether that code path is accessible to an attacker. That's true for targeted attacks. For untargeted at…
-
comment
Comment #49156109
> I’ve run 3.6-27B and 3.6-35B on 32GB locally for a lot of bulk non-code tasks. Do you mind sharing your use cases?
-
comment
Comment #42240583
The anthropic principle is ridiculous. Suppose that, against all odds, you survive the worst plane crash in history. Then you ask NTSB what caused the crash and why you survived. T…
-
comment
Comment #42240463
Fine tuning for the earth might be able to be explained away most easily, like you said. Fine tuning for the universe, though... Firstly, we have zero evidence for multiverse. Some…
-
comment
Comment #42092960
This is a such common logical fallacy that we should have name for it. > No matter how low the odds are, the counts of those potential interactions bring this outcome to a certaint…
-
comment
Comment #42058987
You're asking as if the other candidate is a no-brainer choice. If the other candidate were Kennedy, then sure—but they were not. In this case, many would be undecided and would vo…
-
comment
Comment #41582448
Oct 7 happened and you're suggesting a different approach than a war, i.e. diplomatic solutions? That's too naive—not even the most pacifist country would do that. And let's not pr…
-
comment
Comment #41581955
But if they hide amongst civilians and Israel is too weak, what do you suggest Israel should do instead?
-
comment
Comment #41239419
Yes, cosmological principle is probably the most fundamental assumption in astronomy. Most people don't realize that science—and even everything in life—has to start from some axio…
-
comment
Comment #41221719
> There's a good argument for immutability by default, but many programmers dislike all the extra declarations required. That's one little reason why Rust is loved by many: immutab…
-
comment
Comment #41174182
> there are so many pitfalls when designing this Agree. When people hear the adage "don't roll your own crypto", they often think it refers to crypto primitives only. In reality, i…
-
comment
Comment #41160373
> The costs associated with implementing this requirement can be very small, if not trivial. This is too naive. While it may be the case for single player games that use online con…
-
comment
Comment #41159903
I think it aims mainly at games that use an online connection as a DRM mechanism, such as Hitman 3 and Gran Turismo 7. Both games are single player games that shouldn't necessitate…
-
comment
Comment #40847289
But WAL is not for durability, but for atomicity and consistency. And yes, you need to use fsync to ensure durability.
-
comment
Comment #40727488
If ice didn't float, life as we know it wouldn't be possible anywhere in the universe. (It doesn't exclude life that doesn't require water, though—if that's possible.)
-
comment
Comment #40513609
> You can’t exclude non English languages being you would still be surprised if it was in Spanish etc. I'm not saying that the only surprising result is an English esssay. But sure…
-
comment
Comment #40509018
> Similarly finding any shape in a random set of points is much more likely than the odds of any one shape. Obviously. But that’s not the point (no pun intended). My point is that …
-
comment
Comment #40508795
I agree to almost all your points from the previous four comments, and I think so do you to my comments (because you didn't argue against my statements). We differs only on what to…
-
comment
Comment #40502725
> Sure, but given a large enough sample both will likely exist. This applies to every event with nonzero probabilities. What's your point? > Humans have been finding patterns in cl…
-
comment
Comment #40497586
> Again I think you are confused. Assuming random distribution, 'We Are Coming' is just as likely as any other similarly long structure to form. You are confused. How could we be b…
-
comment
Comment #40494349
> However that doesn't mean that a sphere is any more or less likely than any specific other structure. A shape/structure doesn't have an intrinsic probability. Your sentence is un…
-
comment
Comment #40494117
But of all perspectives in 3D space, there are only a fraction of perspectives that see it as a line. Most other perspectives see it as a circle/ellipse. So, the earth's perspectiv…
-
comment
Comment #40493874
Of course each instance has the same probability. But we're not talking about the probability of an instance, but rather that of a set of instances. In the dice example, it's obvio…
-
comment
Comment #40493787
> Finding ~50 dots arranged in a (very loosely defined) circle, from any projection, of a dense set of 2 trillion of them is very plausible. It depends on the size of the circle, t…
-
comment
Comment #40493396
> The chance of some set of galaxies among all the billions in the sky doing this is much higher. Of course in relative terms it's much higher, but it doesn't matter—what matters i…